Monday, August 20, 2012

Jodi Rudoren of NYTimes Attacked

Attacked for a too 'sympathetic' portrayal of Dani Dayan in her piece on him in the NYTimes.

My comment left here, where Jodi Rudoren is attacked by Jeremy Slater:

Well, so much for the liberal progressive championing of a free press.  If it doesn't tow tow the ideological line, well, fight it and limit it.  But I have full confidence that Jodi R. and her bosses will overcome your criticism and that the paper's overall editorial policy will be quite anti-Jewish residency in Judea and Samaria.

What does irk is the use of "evil" to describe us, to term Palestinian resistance as a "just cause" when all it is is a racist terror campaign directed exclusively against civilians after those Arabs have consistently refused any diplomatic resolve with territorial compromise.  There's not enough room here to argue the inanity of most of your "facts" and portrayals.

Previously, she got hits from Alison Weir.

And on this latest, Mondoweiss slaps her around.

He allows a James north to express his 'outrage' . 

Of course, "It was OK that Rudoren profiled Israeli human rights attorney Michael Sfard.


And from one comment: "She’s already established an equivalency between the two groups, when in fact one side is far worse than the other. She’s not reporting the truth."  Terrible, just terrible.

Gotta love these fanatics. 


^

1 comment:

Chana said...

"Toe the line", not "tow the line".