Thursday, July 04, 2013

Jews and ... Coffee

From this book by Robert Liberles, Jews Welcome Coffee: Tradition and Innovation in Early Modern Germany. reviewed by Sarah E. Wobick-Segev :-
A Strong Brew

...Robert Liberles’s volume, Jews Welcome Coffee, is not primarily about the social and sociable parameters of coffee drinking, but far more about the drink itself and what it “can teach us about early modern Jewish life” (p. xii). Liberles’s book explores both the religious and social responses of Central European Jews to coffee in the early modern period, as well as the economic and everyday history of coffee’s introduction into German Jewish life.
...Juxtaposing the more conservative and negative response to coffee among German Christians, especially the authorities, with the largely positive acceptance of coffee among Jews...Liberles insists, coffee did not change the world, it did reflect symbolically the changing social, cultural, religious, and economic landscape of German Jews and the larger society in which they found themselves...the author concludes that coffee became a lightning rod in debates over “changes in daily life and to challenges to the reigning social structure” where coffee was seen as a metaphorical (and economic) rival to beer (p. 13). The chapter ends with a suggestive linking of the social and political changes facing the growing Jewish population in German lands with the debates over the introduction of this new, foreign drink...Viewed with greater unease in German lands, coffee consumption among the lower classes was greatly feared by elites and authorities as a potential threat to the existing social order. This anxiety manifested itself in repeated attempts to legislate against the consumption of coffee among certain groups.
...Chapter 3, “The Rabbis Welcome Coffee,” plots out the rabbinic response to coffee consumption among the Jews of German lands. It begins with the challenges faced by rabbis who in the very early years of coffee’s distribution in Europe neither agreed upon its appropriate blessing nor knew the various manners by which it could be made. Nonetheless, the rabbinic response to coffee was far more positive than that of German Christian elites...Liberles notes that Jews began drinking coffee habitually at about the same time as middle-class German Christians. Yet he also notes that Jews, at least in the early eighteenth century, preferred to drink their coffee in coffeehouses, including those owned and run by non-Jews, because few knew how to prepare the beverage at home...Much of the chapter is dedicated to a discussion of petty trade in coffee in the Jewish Gasse in Frankfurt, particularly the practice of making and selling “Shabbos coffee.”
.... Lower-class Jews of the region, especially widows, often supplemented their income by preparing coffee for the Sabbath. This practice, which could involve preparing as much as between thirty and fifty pounds of coffee over a larger fire on a Thursday evening, raised the ire and consternation of neighbors who feared that their homes might burn down...Liberles...examines] the case of a local, Christian coffeehouse owner who repeatedly denied service to Jewish customers in 1806...The affair, which continued for the better part of a year, involved attempts on the part of Jewish customers both to take legal action and to take up arms in defense of their right to drink coffee in such a public establishment...lower-class and sometimes unkempt Jews used more rowdy methods as they demanded to be served in a regular coffeehouse” (pp. 130-131). In some ways, the lower classes were more successful because they sought equal access to a social space and not, as in the case of the upper class, social acceptance...

I can only bemoan no references to the imbibing of coffee as reflected in Hassidic literature as in Elliott Horowitz's "Coffee, Coffeehouses, and the Nocturnal Rituals of Early Modern Jewry," ASS Review 14 (1989), 17-46.

^

Me At The Temple Mount Conference

Thanks to this Islamist clip, at this report, pictures of me at the Temple Mount Conference:













To my left is Rav Yosef Elbaum and to my right, Rav Yehudah Glick and Yehudit Dasberg.



^

Temple Mount Storming

After yesterday's report, on female soldiers,



and the raid, we learn that the Islamists are still counting:


50 elements of the Israeli intelligence stormed on Wednesday morning the Al-Aqsa Mosque from the Mughrabi Gate, under the protection of the occupation police.

Media Coordinator of the Al-Aqsa Foundation for Endowment and Heritage Mahmoud Abu Atta told Safa news agency that three groups of intelligence elements stormed in the early morning hours the courtyards of Al-Aqsa Mosque and toured and desecrated the musallas (Prayer rooms).

Meanwhile, 25 settlers stormed the mosque and toured its courtyards, Abu Atta added.

Hundreds of Jerusalemite students were deployed in different parts of the Al-Aqsa, while the Israeli police tightened its security measures at the mosque's gates, especially the Mughrabi Gate.

Media Coordinator of the Al-Aqsa Foundation condemned the persistent raids in al-Aqsa Mosque, and called on the Palestinian people in Jerusalem, the West Bank and in the 1948-occupied territories to intensify their presence in Al-Aqsa,

^

Wednesday, July 03, 2013

I'm in The Blaze

I'm in The Blaze on the excavations at Tel Shiloh.

^

At The Consulate Independence Day Party

This evening the American Consulate-General established as a permanent diplomatic presence in 1857 hosted the annual Independence Day party and I participated after a hiatus of three years, I think.  But that's another story.

It was crowded.  And the kosher table offered potato and noodle kugel and some salad.

I met some new people, saw old friends from the Left like Danny Seidmann and met Betty Hirschman from Ir Amim, Nidal Rafa, and others.  Oh, and finally met, face-to-face, the NYTimes' Jordi Ruderon.

The Consul General, Michael Ratney, here less than a year, is the 50th American diplomat to lead this mission.  He was previously Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Media.  He and his wife, Karen Sasahara, invited the guests.

Here is is making his speech.  He did mention "Israelis" but I'm fairly sure he didn't actually mention "Israel".  He did refer to historical Jerusalem and I'm also certain he didn't mention "Palestinians".

Photographs:


a) Consul General Michael Ratney:


b) The person at the far right below is Rami Hamdallah, the resigned Palestinian Authority Prime Minister.



c) A view of the crowd.



d)  Peace is between people.



e) The Marines always make a great presentation.  That's Miri Maoz-Ovadiah and Yigal Dilmony in-between.



f)  Yours truly and Yigal Dilmony.



g)  IBA's English TV presenter and reporter, Erin Viner and friend.




^



Muslim Space Occupation

This is a picture of how Muslims attempt to "occupy" space on the Temple Mount and obstruct tours of Jews, and other groups of non-Muslims:


But not only do the site and "study" but they are prepared for inderdiction on short-notice and can jump up, scream 'Allahu Akbar' and throw their hands and arms about on cue.  And act very provocatively.

It was their offices that were raided yesterday.

^

The Haredi Chain Gang Poster



It's off to jail, they're willing to go.

^

How To Cheapen a Price Tag Policy

Reported:

A well-known Jewish nationalist activist from the town of Esh Kodesh in Binyamin has revealed that he is an agent with the Shin Bet, Israel’s internal security service, Channel 10 reports...The Esh Kodesh man reportedly gathered his friends and admitted to them that he had been working with the Shin Bet for some time, and had passed on much information on anti-Arab activity to the agency, including information that helped the group to thwart attacks.

The man himself was complicit in several of the attacks he reported.

A source told Arutz Sheva that another well-known Jewish nationalist working in Judea and Samaria (Shomron), who has been interviewed by the media, is working with the Shin Bet as well...

And they still can't stop it?

Or perhaps they don't want it to stop?

It's a possibility.

^

This Story Is Full of Crap

Sorry for being blunt but, facts are facts, even in Haaretz:


Most Palestinian sewage in West Bank untreated, contaminating water along Green Line

According to a report by the Israel Parks and Nature Authority, a lack of Israeli-Palestinian cooperation has impeded solutions to this problem.

Almost 90 percent of sewage from Palestinian towns in the West Bank flows into the environment untreated, contaminating the groundwater and 162 kilometers of streams, according to a report prepared by the Israel Parks and Nature Authority. A lack of Israeli-Palestinian cooperation has impeded solutions to this problem.

...The city of Nablus exemplifies the problem. It has 126,000 residents, as well as many olive presses that produce extremely toxic wastes. It has no treatment plant ‏(though one is now being built‏), so most of the waste goes into the Nablus Stream. From there, about a third seeps into the groundwater of the mountain aquifer, a major source of drinking water for both Palestinians and Israelis. The rest flows into the Alexander Stream in Israel.  Tul Karm’s waste treatment plant broke down last week, as it does several times a year, sending untreated sewage into the Te’enim Stream, and from there to Israel. “This is an area in which we invested great effort cleaning up and repairing damage caused during the winter,” said Nissim Almon, head of the Sharon Drainage Authority. “Now all that work is gone.”

But the worst problem, according to the report, is Hebron, which has nearly 170,000 inhabitants. Its waste includes toxic runoff from industries including stonecutting and leatherworking. More than 80 of the city’s 100 stone-cutting plants send their waste into pirate drainage pools, from which it flows into the Hebron Stream and then to Israel. Waste from the Hebron area alone has contaminated around 43 kilometers of streams.

Jewish settlements also contribute to the problem: 13 percent of their sewage goes into the environment rather than to treatment plants.

...Attempts at Israeli-Palestinian cooperation on this issue have largely gone nowhere, mainly because the Palestinian Authority refuses to cooperate with the settlements. Thus it refused to connect Palestinian towns in the northern West Bank to an Israeli sewage line because the line also serves several settlements. It also nixed a proposed treatment plant that would serve both Palestinian towns and the settlement of Ariel.

Who will knock some sense into their heads?

The land is there for all.

To destroy it is being fanatically illogical and irrational.

The Arabs hate us and they hate us so much that they would even destroy, contaminate and poison the land they claim is theirs just so long as we can't be there.

They define themselves not who they are and represent but by their negativism vs. Jews and Zionism.

That's idiocy and the EU and even the US supports this approach.

^

NYTimes Publishes My Opinion Written By Barry Lynn

Yesterday's NYTimes published this letter on its web site and today in the print edition:

To the Editor:

Re “Mideast Chaos Grows as U.S. Focuses on Israel” (front page, July 2):
      
We find it strange that Secretary of State John Kerry visits “us” so often. After all, we know that there isn’t going to be a grand peace agreement because there are irreconcilable differences between the parties (no satisfactory compromise is possible).
      
What we do need is encouragement to continue building the interconnections between peoples and lower level government employees that have led to several years of relative peace with the West Bank Palestinians, and even several months of quiet between Gaza and us. This is where the hard work should be done, and this has the greatest chance of success.
      
BARRY LYNN
Efrat, West Bank, July 2, 2013
 
Barry has expressed what I have told, for the past three decades (!), successive American Consulate-Generals, political officers here, visiting State Department visitors from Washington, division heads at the Near East Unit at State in Washington, Senators and Congressmen and in this blog (see here; here; here; for recent posts).
 
The US Consulate policy here of discriminating by ignoring the Jewish/Israeli population of now 360,000 residents in Judea and Samaria as to joint events of culture, art, music, theater, sport, etc., equal opportunity programs of democracy workshops, leadership seminars, etc., is not only, I think, illegal and anti-constitutional, but simply quite un-American.
 
And also a futile and counter-peace effort.
 
Peace is between peoples and if the US accepts the Arab viewpoint that Jews shouldn't even live in Judea and Samaria, that is, in the end, an apartheid approach, besides accepting the Arab intransigency as normative in politics.
 
^

Tuesday, July 02, 2013

Temple Mount Activists Raided

That should be "Moslem Activists".

Here:

The "Foundation for the Architecture of the Haram and Its Sanctuaries" announced in a statement circulated Tuesday, 02.07.2013 AD that about thirty members of Israel's intelligence unit and police 'stormed' its offices located in the Saladin Street in Jerusalem and confiscated all its contents from a computer and a digital memory.
...The Foundation works openly the statement said: "We are working above ground and under the sun, and no need for the Israeli occupation to do this".

^

What's In A Name

Elula, female derivation of Elul, the name of the sixth month on the Hebrew calendar, was used by Isla Fisher and Sacha Baron Cohen for their second daughter.

I couldn't find an exact date of birth but Rosh Chodesh Ellul was August 11th in 2010 the year she was born.

Elula actually means "to Ellul".

Makes sense?

^

Will Kerry Be Accused of Promoting Pro-Temple Mount Policies?

Look who is taking pictures:







Source

^

Israel Did Not Burn This Arab

If somehow this gets garbled and you think Israel set this Arab alight, here's the truth:


Liberated prisoner Wisam Marof set himself alight in front of the finance ministry in Ramallah on Sunday protesting the PA’s neglect of his condition.  Eyewitnesses said that Marof, 20, suffered burns in his hands and chest.

Palestinian media quoted Marof after the incident as saying that the PA was marginalizing him and many other liberated prisoners from Israeli jails.

He said that the finance and prisoners’ ministries in Ramallah did not give him any financial assistance despite his difficult economic and health conditions at the pretext that he did not meet the required criteria.

If pressed, I would point a finger at the ... EU.

After all, it's their money that's supporting most of the PA.

^

Haaretz Can't Stand Samarian Tourism

From their story by Moshe Gilad today on our wines, our views, our archaeology, which, par for the course, must have a sinister thread:

Welcome to Tuscany, just 10 minutes east of the Green Line

Settler leaders are engaged in a large public relations effort to sell the northern West Bank as a beautiful and safe tourist destination. They have a lot to show, but also to hide.
 


Nati Yisraeli...is the tourism coordinator of the Samaria Regional Council...

"Our strategy has changed during this period," he said. "Once we would organize demonstrations. Today it's the exact opposite. We simply want people to come and get to know us; to like us. That's why we've invited you."

"Look," he said, spreading his arms to indicate the view. "This is Tuscany, and it's 10 minutes away from your house in Petah Tikva...A large public relations effort is underway to sell both Israeli citizens and tourists around the world on the idea of Samaria as a beautiful and safe tourist destination.

...The first stop on the tour was the veranda in Havat Yair - an unauthorized outpost...The spacious veranda is part of Tamari's Shack, a cafe and bed-and-breakfast owned by Doron and Tamar Nir-Zvi, who live next door. The Nir-Zvi family started their business three years ago, and it is the first B&B in Samaria. The views are breathtaking.

...From Havat Yair we traveled to the city of Ariel to visit the Eshel Hashomron Hotel - the only hotel in the vicinity. Hotel manager Tuvia Gelbard explained that most of the 100-room hotel's guests are Christian pilgrims from Europe. Israelis turn up on weekends.

...On the way to Sebastia, we passed through the Palestinian village of al-Punduk and continued via Jatt in the direction of Kedumim. At every junction stood Jewish hitchhikers...We traveled in his jeep to the disused railway station near Sebastia, where in 1975, the Gush Emunim settlement organization established its first settlement in Samaria...The station is deserted, and Elmakayes told me of plans to convert it into a museum documenting Jewish settlement in the area.

Then we continued to the ancient site of Sebastia, and Elmakayes took me on a guided tour, with interesting explanations about the site's history...



...We traveled to Rachelim, a settlement established in 1991 but recognized only a year ago as an independent settlement, to visit the Tura boutique winery...

...The last view of the day, from the peak of Mount Kabir, awakened no end of questions: Does anyone, for all the endless talk about establishing two states for two nations, have a fair solution to the Palestinian problem? Is evacuating the settlements in Samaria viable? Don't the thousands of homes I saw on the hilltops render such a solution unrealistic and disconnected from reality?
All the people I met were welcoming and hospitable. But the reality is different - disconnected, insoluble and discouraging.

I left out his propagandizing.  After all, Haaretz doesn't hide its antagonism.

Better just to sip the wine and enjoy the views.
 

^

From Pathetic to Pessimistic

Findings from this:-

Joint Israeli Palestinian Poll, June 2013

conducted jointly by the Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research in Ramallah, supported by the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung in Ramallah and Jerusalem.
 

- Only 27% of the Palestinians and 10% of the Israelis think that the two sides will return to negotiations and violence will stop while 34% of the Israelis and 31% of the Palestinians believe that negotiations will resume but some armed attacks will continue as well. 

-  44% of the Israelis and 15% of the Palestinians think that the two sides will not return to negotiations and armed attacks will not stop 

-  21% of the Palestinians believe that the two sides will not return to negotiations but that violence will not resume.
-  57% of Palestinians think that Israel’s goals in the long run are to extend its borders to cover all the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea and expel its Arab citizens

-  25% of the Arabs think the goals are to annex the West Bank while denying political rights to the Palestinians.

-  37% of the Israelis think that the Palestinian aspirations in the long run are to conquer the State of Israel and destroy much of the Jewish population in Israel

- 17% of the Israeli think the goals of the Palestinians are to conquer the State of Israel.
Main findings there.

^

More on Tel Shiloh

I uploaded two photographs of Tel Shiloh from 1937.

Now there is this (based on an Israel Today report):

...archaeologists will display their findings this week at the Shilo site in Samaria, in a conference that is to be held by the Shilo Organization. 

Among the findings are holes hewn into the rock at the site [see this from 1988]. These holes, the archaeologists explain, could have been used in order to prop up wooden beams used in a temporary structure like the Tabernacle. The beams formed part of the walls of the Tabernacle, and they would have had to be fixed to the ground in some way.

Next to the hewn holes, in the northern part of Tel Shilo, structures have been discovered that date to the period between Joshua and King David.

Earthenware vessles [sic] and three large stoves were also found in one of the structures. The researchers say they were not intended for home use. This makes it more likely that the structures were part of a central public facility.

In addition, remains have been found of what appears to be the south-western corner of the wall that surrounded the city of Shilo. On the basis of this finding, researchers can also estimate where the entrance gate to the city was, and this in turn has implications for the location of the Tabernacle, which is known [only to Yossi Gurfinkel] to have been located near the entrance gate...

^

Yes, They Are Termed "Judea and Samaria"

As I have noted, the correct geo-political names of the regions between the Jordan River and Israel are Judea and Samaria.

They are recorded so in the Bible, the New Testament and other historical documents.

EOZ assists:

From the Report by His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom to the Council of the League of Nations on the Administration of PALESTINE AND TRANS-JORDAN for the year 1938:
Jerusalem [is] situated in the midst of the hills of Judea, and the principal towns are Haifa, with its modern harbour, in the north at the entrance to the plain of Esdraelon; Jaffa, a second port which lies some 40 miles west- north-west of Jerusalem; Tel Aviv, which is contiguous to Jaffa; and Nablus, the ancient Sichem, in the hills of Samaria.
From UN document A/364, September 1947:
Apart from these inland plains in the north and portions of the desert area in the south, the interior of the country is very mountainous with the hills of Judea and Samaria in the centre and the hills of Galilee in the north....
The proposed Arab State will include Western Galilee, the hill country of Samaria and Judea with the exclusion of the City of Jerusalem, and the coastal plain from Isdud to the Egyptian frontier....
From UN A/RES/181(II) 29 November 1947:
The boundary of the hill country of Samaria and Judea starts on the Jordan River at the Wadi Malih south-east of Beisan and runs due west to meet the Beisan-Jericho road and then follows the western side of that road in a north-westerly direction to the junction of the boundaries of the sub-districts of Beisan, Nablus, and Jenin. From that point it follows the Nablus-Jenin sub-district boundary westwards for a distance of about three kilometres and then turns north-westwards, passing to the east of the built-up areas of the villages of Jalbun and Faqqu'a, to the boundary of the sub-districts of Jenin and Beisan at a point north-east of Nuris.....
These are all official documents in the UN archives.
In 1998, the PLO expressed its anger at the use of this ancient - and accurate - term:

It is shocking that the Foreign Minister, while speaking of the agreement, uses a phrase like "Judea and Samaria" to describe the West Bank, in flagrant violation of the Wye River Memorandum and other existing agreements between the two sides. The use of such a term is indicative of an expansionist ideology and policies.
The UN didn't start capitalizing "West Bank" as a place name until at least 1968.

Daled Amos helps.

You can peruse Hansard and find gems:

1)  1934

     Mr. MAGNAY

    May I ask whether the conditions in Samaria are worse than they are at Escomb in the County of Durham?

    § Mr. FOOT

    I am not in a position to say; I have not visited the County of Durham.

2)  1982

Mr Ivan Lawrence (and others)
Written Answers — January 27

    asked the Lord Privy Seal on what basis Her Majesty's Government have decided that the Israeli occupation of Judaea and Samaria is illegal; and what advice he has received from legal authorities

The answer came later:

Mr. Hurd

In the Government's view, Israeli settlements in the territories which historically formed part of Judaea and Samaria are illegal by virtue of the fact that their establishment is inconsistent with Israel's status as an occupying power and is contrary to certain provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention, to which Israel is a party.

The Government recognised Jordanian sovereignty over these territories in 1950. Jordan has made clear that she maintains her claim to sovereignty over the West Bank until such time as the Palestinians are able to decide its future for themselves.

3)  A quite revealing legal interpretation in 1982 by Latham:

I do not believe that the area that is described in United Nations General Assembly resolution 181 of 29 November 1947 as "Judaea and Samaria" belongs automatically to Israel or to Jordan. I consider that its status is undetermined. The last legal owner was the British mandatory power, which itself acted with dubious legality when Sir Winston Churchill, after the Cairo conference of 1921, put the Emir Faisal on the throne of Iraq and made his brother the Emir Abdullah the independent ruler of a newly invented country of Transjordan, contrary to the decisions of the San Remo conference.

This was also wholly contrary to the spirit of the MacMahon correspondence with Sherif Husain and was in accordance with the cynical diplomacy of the secret Sykes-Picot agreement. Only two countries have ever recognised the Jordanian annexation between 1950 and 1967, one of which was Britain. That annexation was no more legal in terms of treaties than would Mr. Begin's annexation of the same territories be now. It was based solely on the rights of conquest by a belligerent Power. It is not even clear whether Jordan still maintains a territorial claim over what it calls the West Bank or whether this claim was vacated in favour of the PLO at the Rabat conference of 1974.

4)  1923


Since the last debate on this subject-in this House, on March 27, much has occurred in Palestine...It has been repeatedly said in this House that you will never be able to persuade the Arab and Christian populations of Palestine, who form the large and preponderating majority of the people of that country, to assent to a Zionist system of Government...

...An Election has recently taken place in Palestine. The Arab Congress rejected that Election, and although prolonged to nine months, with every effort that is coupled with the prolongation of an Election in all countries to induce people to vote, in the three districts of Jaffa, Samaria, and the southern district, almost the entire Arab and Christian population refused to take any part, in the other two districts only a partial number took part. The reason why these people refused was quite clear.

(Incidentally, he later misquotes the same way Avishai Margalit misquoted the Mandate decision based on the Balfour Declaration, so:

It is true that subsequent to that pledge an undertaking was given in a Declaration to endeavour to establish a Zionist Home in Palestine, but that was conditional on such policy not interfering in any way with the "civil and religious rights of the Arab and Christian community.")

5)  1994

I understand that the Question before the House is: "whether the Jewish settlements in the Occupied Territories violate Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention"...I assume that my noble friend is referring to the last paragraph of Article 49. It states: "The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies"...I remind the House of Article 2. It states that, "the present convention shall apply to … armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties". The convention applies, "to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party"." I therefore ask the House to consider this question: which is the high contracting party whose territory is occupied? In other words, which state has sovereign title to the West Bank?

In 1967 Jordan was in occupation. It is generally accepted that after its annexation of the territories, Jordan had no sovereignty in international law. Its presence in Judaea and Samaria was only given de jure recognition by two countries out of the whole international community. Therefore, if one is dealing with points of law, as my noble friend's Question seeks, it seems clear that the West Bank, at present occupied by Israel, does not belong to any other state, and the convention therefore does not apply. The answer to the first and dominant part of my noble friend's Question is therefore no.

I shall raise another matter if I have time. The last legal sovereignty over the territories was that of the League of Nations mandate of 1922. It can be argued that its provisions still hold legal weight. The mandate stipulated that the area was to be part of the Jewish homeland, and that Jewish settlement there was to be encouraged.

That seems to have an echo in the Levy Report.  And Baroness Chalker said further on in the debate:

The final status of these territories has to be addressed in the final stage of the peace process negotiations.

6)  There was this idiot in 2003:



...let us ask ourselves why religious people involve themselves at all in what their opponents describe as terrorism: whether they are Roman Catholic or Protestant fanatics in Northern Ireland; Islamic extremists from Saudi Arabia joining the ranks of Al'Qaeda; or extreme Zionists preaching the expulsion of Palestinians, both Muslim and Christian, from Samaria and Judea.

7) 1919

In the plan for the offensive which commenced on September 19, the 21st Corps (Lieut.-General Bulfin) were to attack and break through the Turkish defences on the coastal plain and open a way for the Cavalry. The latter were to advance along the coast and cross the hills of Samaria into the plain of Esdraelon, thus intercepting the Turkish line of retreat.

8)  Discussing the proposed Partition in 1937, note the surmised result:

The proportion of Arabs to Jews in the Jewish State, apart from the mandated towns, is planned to be 225 to 259. There, and in the mandated towns, the same difficulties and problems will arise as in the present mandated territory, but aggravated by the existence of a strong Arab State in the hills of Judea and Samaria, jealously watching the fate of the Arab minorities in the Jewish State, and with a regular army to support its protest instead of bands of hastily, clandestinely and lightly-armed rioters. That, it seems to me, is a dangerous position for the Jewish State to occupy...The White Paper goes on: "Above all, fear and suspicion would be replaced by a sense of confidence and security, and both peoples would obtain, in the words of the Commission, 'the inestimable boon of peace'." What peace? 

What prospects of peace do the declarations of all the representatives of Arab opinion, with the exception, as the right hon. Gentleman pointed out, of the Emir Abdullah hold out? The Secretary of State referred to the declaration of the Prime Minister of Iraq, but he did not read it out. The Prime Minister of Iraq says: "Any person venturing to agree to act as head of such a State"—" that is, an Arab State such as the Government propose to set up— "would be regarded as an outcast throughout the Arab world and would incur the wrath of Moslems all over the East. I declare, both as the head of an Arab Government and as a private citizen, that I should always oppose any individual's right to stab the Arab race in the heart in order to secure the rulership of the proposed new State."

9)  and anti-apartheid semantics in 1982:

What Britain and the Europeans must do requires true even-handedness and a sensitive awareness that in approaching either side one is dealing with suspicious minds, fine-tuned ears and outraged self-respect. To the Israeli consensus the mere mention of a Palestinian State, whether by means of a Freudian slip or pious wish, is just as obnoxious as are the terms Judea and Samaria or a roll-call of Jewish West Bank settlements to a forum of Arab nationalists. Yet one day, when the dust has settled, perhaps the right of Palestinian Arabs to political self expression and the right of Jews to settle anywhere within historic Palestine must and will be reconciled.



10)  Last but perhaps the best - note that "Palestine" is not mentioned by Charles Cumming Bruce but Samaria is part of Syria, from 1841:


...is it not curious, to say the least of it, that we should then have fought, and paid, and struggled, to wrest from Turkey her Grecian provinces, lying at the very gates of Constantinople, and from which she drew the best sailors of her fleets and that we should now fight and pay and struggle to restore to her, her Syrian Provinces, situated much more remotely, and from which I will undertake to say, from a pretty accurate knowledge of the various little independent nations which inhabit them, the Druses, the Maronites, the Ansaeri, the Moutoualis, the Bedouins of Samaria, differing as they do in habits, religion, and origin—Turkey will derive little else than the necessity of contending with an ever-renewing insurrection. But the classic recollections of Greece spoke perhaps more powerfully than the hallowed memories of Jerusalem.

One more, as it seems to define J&S as inherently Jewish, from 1990:


...the second new development, which has far more serious long-term consequences for the region, is the recent. current and anticipated influx of so many Soviet Jews into Israel. Following the opening of the floodgates in October 1989, 120,000 have arrived in the first year...therefore it is understandable that Palestinian refugees fear that such an influx will prove to be at their expense in terms of jobs, housing and the resources that Israel currently makes available in the occupied territories.

In discussions that I had with four Israeli Ministers —it was my privilege to meet four Ministers in one day —including Mr. Sharon, the Housing Minister, it was suggested that there were no grounds for such fears, and that, in any case, Israel has assured the United States of America, as its major donor, that there will be no settlement of Soviet Jews in what is termed Judaea and Sumaria [sic] —the west bank.

I fear that I have found clear evidence that Soviet Jews are settling beyond the green line in east Jerusalem, and on the west bank
.

^

Judea and Samaria Quiz

Who declared

Whatever the legal ownership, I see no reason why the West Bank as a whole should be regarded as Judenrein. The whole of Transjordan was deliberately kept free of Jews by the British, and has been so ever since.

If Jews wish to live in the historic areas of Judea and Samaria from which so much of their civilisation sprang, I see no reason why they should not do so. But that is not to determine the eventual status of the area. That remains to be settled in the context of an overall peace settlement in accordance with Security Council resolution 242.


Possible Answers:

a)  Yassir Arafat

b)  Saeb Erekat

c)  Raad Salah

d)  Barack Obama

e)  Menachem Begin

f)  Vladimir Putin

g) Pope Francis


Real Answer.

Who?

Him.


And he elaborates:


Only one solution remains on the table. It is not the Venice declaration, which has been rejected by both Israel and the PLO, or the Fahd plan, which collapsed like a house of cards when even the PLO, which was supposed to have drafted it, turned against it. Only the Camp David agreements remain...It is instructive to read directly from those sections of the Camp David accords which deal with the West Bank and Gaza...The negotiations are to recognise the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people and their just requirements...

...President Sadat and President Carter both saw that here was a tremendous opportunity for the West Bank Arabs. It could ultimately have led to a Palestinian autonomous State...if only the PLO had not prevented the local Arabs from seizing the best opportunity they ever had to achieve something that there has never been—an autonomous Palestinian State with recognised borders. But the PLO rejected it, just as the Arabs rejected Peel, Unscop and so much else as well.

The reason is very clear. The PLO is not really interested in a mini-State on the West Bank, except as a preliminary to the ultimate extinction of what it calls the "Zionist entity" itself. It means what it says. There is no reason to disbelieve it. That is why Israel will never countenance handing over the West Bank to them, no matter how many resolutions are passed at the United Nations or at Venice.

You can also read this there, in 1982:-

If Israel shells the PLO that is called genocide, but if President Assad shells his own people it is ignored.

and

No Middle Eastern country has lifted a finger to help the PLO over the past two weeks. No Arab nation really wants the PLO.

^

Pochter's Past Left Him No Future

From here:


His mother, Elizabeth Pochter, maintained that her son read poems to his girlfriend about the “Israeli-Palestinian conflict,”  and insisted that somehow the endless jihad against The Jewish State, “wasn’t just about some detached war to him, but a struggle that he passionately wanted to resolve.” Elizabeth Pochter added, according to a statement by Kenyon College, that her Jewish son was a person who didn’t see the world as separate nations, but a collection of vibrant cultures.

In case you're not with it,

The US State Department has identified the American student killed in renewed violence in Egypt as 21-year-old Andrew Pochter.  Pochter, of Chevy Chase, Maryland, was in Alexandria to teach English and improve his Arabic, according to his family. Clashes between supporters and opponents of president Mohamed Morsi became violent this week ahead of a planned mass demonstration.

"He went to Egypt because he cared profoundly about the Middle East, and he planned to live and work there in the pursuit of peace and understanding," the family said in a statement.

The State Department said Saturday it did not have information on the circumstances surrounding Pochter's death, but the family said: "As we understand it, he was witnessing the protest as a bystander and was stabbed by a protester."

I guess he didn't quite grasp the culture.

Unfortunately, there are too many American Jewish students with:

- no proper knowledge of the Middle East, Arab culture and Islamist custom;
- too much enthusiasm and passion;
- a progressive/liberal outlook;
- too little Jewish background.


P.S.

Raised a Christian, he was reared in a home with both Christian and Jewish parents, said his mother, Elizabeth Pochter,
 

^

Even the NYTimes Thinks It's Pathetic

For those who didn't appreciate my "pathetic Kerry" post, from the other day, especially Mr. Kerry, look what I found in the NYTimes:-

The new secretary of state’s exertions — reminiscent of predecessors like Henry A. Kissinger and James A. Baker III — have been met with the usual mix of hope and skepticism. But with so much of the Middle East still convulsing from the effects of the Arab Spring, Mr. Kerry’s efforts raise questions about the Obama administration’s priorities at a time of renewed regional unrest. 

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, once a stark symbol and source of grievance in the Arab world, is now almost a sideshow in a Middle East consumed by sectarian strife, economic misery and, in Egypt, a democratically elected leader fighting for legitimacy with many of his people. 

“The moment for this kind of diplomacy has passed,” said Robert Blecher, deputy director of the Middle East and North Africa Program of the International Crisis Group. “He’s working with actors who have acted in this movie before, and the script is built around the same elements. But the theater is new; the region is a completely different place today.” 

Administration officials no longer argue, as they did early in President Obama’s first term, that ending the Israeli occupation and creating a Palestinian state is the key to improving the standing of the United States in the Middle East. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is now just one headache among a multitude. And yet Mr. Kerry, backed by Mr. Obama, still believes that tackling the problem is worth the effort:

A view that fits mine.

^

Monday, July 01, 2013

From Dani Dayan Interview

Following up on the trip of Dani Dayan to Washington, there are these excerpts from this interview:-

Dani Dayan, former head of the Council of Jewish Communities of Judea, Samaria, and the Gaza Strip, Israel’s top settler group, scoffed at Secretary of State John Kerry’s latest peace push during a sit-down on Wednesday with the Washington Free Beacon.  Dayan was in D.C. to meet with lawmakers on Capitol Hill and other Washington insiders in an effort to galvanize support for Israel’s settler communities and warn that the administration’s renewed efforts to foster peace will likely end in violence.


...“I’m sure [President Barack] Obama knows Kerry has no chance to succeed,” Dayan said, explaining that the Obama of 2013 is very different from the Obama of 2008 when it comes to the peace process...“That’s a tremendous mistake to let Kerry try,” Dayan added. “Why? Because he has no chance to succeed. And his failure will damage Israel, the Palestinians, and will damage the United States of America.”

“It will damage Israel because the expectations he created will blow up and may bring violence,” he explained. “It will damage the Palestinians because they will be frustrated and do crazy things, and we pay a price for the crazy things they do like it always happens.”

“But mainly it will damage the U.S. because the U.S. will be perceived again as a failure,” he continued.

Dayan said he communicated this message to more than a dozen Democratic and Republican lawmakers and aides during a series of meetings last week...Dayan said his newfound ability to sit down with top officials in D.C. is proof that the oft-criticized settler movement is gaining legitimacy.  “People used to neglect our existence. Now they are thirsty to hear us,” Dayan said. “The change is as dramatic as it can be.”

...The two-state solution is effectively dead, Dayan said.  “In the short and mid term we have to forget about finding a solution because the pursuit of a solution prevents us from doing beneficial things on the ground, like [fostering] human rights, more freedom and democracy, more prosperity, better dwelling conditions” for the Palestinians, he said.

^

Peres the Diplomat Putters Around

He's at it again, for the fourth (or fifth) time these past few months:-


President Peres held a diplomatic working meeting with Italian Prime Minister Enrico Letta
President Shimon Peres, this afternoon (Monday, 1 July 2013), held a diplomatic working meeting with Italian Prime Minister Enrico Letta. At the beginning of the meeting President Peres addressed US Secretary of State John Kerry's efforts to restart the peace talks and said, "Secretary Kerry is working on restarting the negotiations between us and the Palestinians. There are already some openings and I believe the efforts on both sides should continue. The differences between the sides are small, especially in comparison with the dangers of not making peace."

Is anyone going to demand of him that he stop interfering?


^

Jlm Deputy-Mayor Opposes Corrie Play at Khan

I blogged about this here.

And I learn:

Deputy Mayor of Jerusalem opposes 'My Name is Rachel Corrie' production at the Khan Theatre in Jerusalem

Still waiting for the Mayor and the Minister for Culture about the funding issue.



______________


UPDATE



In Hebrew, threat to cut off funding.

And it seems a hunch I had is true:  they just rented out the facility.  But the highlighting of all those state bodies was then very much a less-than-truth-in-advertising.


^

Mr. Kerry, Tell That to Jonathan Pollard

US Secretary of State John Kerry has responded to allegations that the US bugged the offices of its allies, saying its activities were "not unusual" in international relations.
...He continued: "Every country in the world that is engaged in international affairs of national security undertakes lots of activities to protect its national security, and all kinds of information contributes to that."

Mr. Kerry, so why is Jonathan Pollard still in jail?

^

Price Tagger Tagged?

Nine months after the Trappist monastery in Latrun was vandalized in a suspected price-tag attack in November 2012, a 22-year-old resident of the haredi town of Bnei Brak was arrested on Sunday on suspicion of involvement.  The suspect is accused of vandalizing property, arson, conspiracy to commit a crime and obstruction of justice. He is suspected of setting the monastery door on fire and spray painting derogatory slogans on the walls of the building like "Jesus is a monkey" alongside the names of various Jewish outposts in Judea and Samaria.
The suspect arrived in court for extension of remand wearing a T-shirt that said: "Jews, come on, let's win."  The suspect is a known right-wing activist who operated in Judea and Samaria before relocating to Bnei Brak as a result of a restraining order. 

^ 

Here Come the "Fanatics" Say the Extremists

Rise in Number of Jews in Al-Aqsa Mosque, says Group 


JERUSALEM, July 1, 2013 (WAFA- PLO news agency) – Number of Israeli Jews .visiting the Muslim al-Aqsa Mosque [which is the Jewish Temple Mount before it was the Muslim a--Aqsa Mosque/Haram A-Sharif] compound in Jerusalem’s Old City on Monday has witnessed a significant rise in attempt to create new facts on the ground, al-Aqsa Foundation said in a statement.

It said small groups of Israeli fanatics and around 60 uniformed female Israeli soldiers toured the compound




in what appears to be an attempt to have daily presence for Jews on the Muslim site.



...Muslims fear Israeli fanatics backed by officials aim to destroy their holy sites in order to build a Jewish temple on their ruins. They warn that such an act would provoke violence.


And by the way, if Erekat also keeps avoiding Jerusalem, he's a fanatic, too:

Dr. Erekat: “Israel Has Been Rewarded For its Crimes, Leaving Tel Aviv with No Incentive to Move for Peace”

Tel Aviv?



^


The Drip of "Holy Blood"

A new three-part documentary series is being shown on Channel 10.

It's entitled "Holy/Sacred Blood" and is created by Itzik Lerner:


Those who comprehend Hebrew can watch the first part here.

It focuses on Hebron's Cave of the Patriarchs, Shechem's Joseph's Tomb and Jerusalem's Temple Mount.

Last night we viewed Joseph's Tomb.

What you didn't learn:

-  that the Oslo Accords fixed the right of Jews to visit by demand of the government of Israel and so the visits are not some quirk of a bunch of weird and fanatic banshees swooping down of the Tomb.

- that normal secular people visit and think access should be guaranteed in safety.

What was misconstrued:

-  the Tomb did not appear in an Arab residential area, as understood by the narration, but the residential area grew around it -




- that Jews visit graves of holy men all over Israel, especially in the north but also in Egypt, the Ukraine and New York.  In other words, a fairly normative practice.

- the inconvenienced Arab family is provided long screen time although you do get to see stone throwing and killing of Jews (Hillel Lieberman is missing) and so the hostility is a bit low-keyed.

Will it get better, or worse?

^

When Salvador Dali Drew Zionism

Salvador Dali's "Virgin of Israel" painting:-




The "Wailing Wall":-



All post-1967/

^

This Cantor Is Not Singing

American Jewish man refused entry to UK.


A local Jewish student was denied entry into the United Kingdom late last month. After being detained for more than nine hours, he was put back on a plane to the United States by customs officials. During that time he was never told why he was being denied entry. He was told his photo and fingerprints have now been placed in a database that will make it difficult for him to obtain entry into the U.K. or any other E.U. country.
The U.K. man who had offered Louis “Chip” Cantor summer work experience and is not Jewish, Kevin Shilling, said the U.K. Border Agency agent he spoke to in his attempt to get Cantor admitted into the country made more than one anti-Semitic comment to him during the telephone conversation they had.


Details:-

The Jewish Chronicle.

Hanni's Blog.

And don't forget the Pamela Geller/Robert Spencer banning.

^