"Conquest". You caught that?
That comes from a book, a nine-volume Corpus to be
organized according to major geographical and/or historical divisions in ancient Judaea/Palestina: Jerusalem and its surroundings; the middle coastline north of Tel Aviv and south of Haifa with Caesarea as the focal point; the southern coastline with its urban hinterland; Galilee and the northern coastline including Acco; the Golan Heights; Samaria; Judaea
(without Jerusalem) and Idumaea; the Negev...[and] Parts of modern Syria and Jordan which were at different times part of the administrative unit which included Iudaea/Palestine ”
The Corpus is divided into
...three chronological groups: (1) The Hellenistic period up to the destruction of the Second Temple in 70; (2) The Roman period from 70 to the reign of Constantine; (3) Late Antiquity, from Constantine to the Arab Conquest.”
Source
Posts
3 comments:
I left them a message... ;))
What seems to be the problem, exactly?
EI was conquered by Arabs and was widely known as Syria-Palestina after the failure of Bar-Kohba's revolt, and Iudea before it.
To ד"פ
the "problem" is that the Arabs claim they've been here since, well, the Jebusites. And "conquer"? Heck, no.
But history says otherwise and I pointed that out.
Post a Comment