Anti-semitism is the hate of Jews for being Jews.
Being Jewish includes the belief that the Land of Israel is the covenanted homeland of the Jewish nation.
It is the land where the nation, as a federation of the Twelve Tribes, settled in under the leadership of Joshua after Moshe brought the Israelites out of Egypt back into the land of the Forefathers.
It is the land in which the Monarchy ruled.
It is the land which first withstood and then was defeated when the Assyrian Empire invaded.
It is the land which revolted against the Greek-Selecuid occupiers.
The land that stood up to the Roman occupiers.
The land in which the entire ancient religious and cultural heritage of the Jewish People, in its unique Hebrew language, was formulated and fashioned.
The land to which Jews constantly and continually returned over the 18 centuries of foreign rule including the Byzantines, the Persians, the Muslim Arabs, the Crusaders, the Mamlukes, Ottomans, British and Jordanians and the loss of political indendence.
It is the land where the Two Temples stood and served as sacred sites of worship.
It is the land in which special commandments can be exclusively fulfilled and no where else.
It is the land that, ever since Talmudic times of the second Babylonian exile, Jews felt obligated to support those living in it, especially the scholars, sending charity funds from across 70 countries of the Diaspora.
It is the land towards which Jews pray, no matter wher they may be - north, south, east, west.
It is the land mentioned in our daily prayers, our Shabbat and Festival prayers, in the Passover Haggada, Tisha B'Av elegies and more.
Anyone who seeks to sever the connection between Jews and the Land of Israel, anyone who claims there is no Torah-based directive to return to it and reside in it and make it bloom, who declares him or herself an anti-Zionist, is being anti-Jewish.
They may love Jews but to dislike and disregard the Land of Israel, ideologically, economcially, politically or security-wise, to reject the right of the Jews to establish a state in their historic homeland, is being anti-semitic.
^
Posts
11 comments:
Moral Collapse on Air: Why Antonia Hylton Chose the Wrong Voices: When Criticism Loses Credibility: The Tucker Carlson–Candace Owens Problem.
On April 7, 2026, during MS Now, anchor Antonia Hylton opened the program by invoking Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens as moral reference points in a critique of Donald Trump. That framing is not just questionable—it is profoundly irresponsible.
Both figures carry well-documented records of amplifying or legitimizing extremist narratives that fundamentally undermine any claim to moral authority.
Candace Owens has publicly trivialized the atrocities of the Holocaust, dismissing Josef Mengele’s medical experiments at Auschwitz as “bizarre propaganda.” This is not a minor controversy or a misstatement—it is Holocaust minimization, a form of historical distortion that erodes the factual basis of one of history’s most documented genocides.
Meanwhile, Tucker Carlson has repeatedly elevated figures aligned with neo-Nazi and white nationalist ideologies. He has praised Darryl Cooper—who reframes Nazi concentration camps as logistical failures rather than instruments of deliberate genocide and casts Winston Churchill as the central villain of World War II—as a major intellectual voice. Carlson has also platformed Nick Fuentes, a figure widely known for explicit antisemitism, Holocaust denial, and admiration for Hitler, in a lengthy and notably uncritical interview.
To cite either of these individuals as moral exemplars—implicitly or explicitly—is to collapse the distinction between legitimate political critique and the normalization of extremist revisionism. It signals a breakdown in editorial judgment, where notoriety is mistaken for credibility and provocation for principle.
Criticism of Trump may be warranted. But anchoring that criticism in voices that have trafficked in historical distortion and extremist sympathy doesn’t strengthen the argument—it corrodes it.
Apr 7, 2026
So what? It does not make Jews superhuman or more entitled to a piece of land than any other of those that lived there at the same time as Jewish ancestors. Your rhetoric is exactly the same as German nazis.
Dear Anon.: it does not make us less moral or just than nay other national group, espoecially those hating Jews and trying to kill them. As for Nazis, grow up. No Jew attacked Germans, blew up their supermarkets, firebombed their churches, etc. before Hitler & his Nazis.
:
RACIST LYING CAITLIN JOHSTONE.
1. Pushing the "genocide" lie within week of the response to genocidal “Palestine” Hamas regime atrocities (who also uses its civilians).
2. Trivialized the Holocaust by vile complete comparisons.
3. Permission to Holocaust-denial 'unz' to republish her rubbish pieces.
[https://d7xn3i3ddb0lmn.archive.is/WuMoS/1afcca824a08b99151f40dc1a551300a5bd9625d.jpg]
Mit deutschem Gruß für Palästina - DER SPIEGEL.
https://web.archive.org/web/20211210015727/https://www.spiegel.de/politik/mit-deutschem-gruss-fuer-palaestina-a-9582b8ae-0002-0001-0000-000041123966
With German greetings to Palestine.
December 19, 1947 • from DER SPIEGEL 51/1947.
Kaukji is the predestined commander-in-chief of a volunteer army for Palestine. Together with the Grand Mufti, whose confidant and best friend he is, he was one of the ringleaders of the bloody Palestinian Arab uprising against Jewish immigration in 1936-39. He was severely wounded at that time and fled Palestine. During the war, he met with the Grand Mufti, who had also gone on a journey, in Germany. He has not forgotten what he found so appealing back then: his volunteers are sworn in with the "German salute" under the green flag of the Pr_phet.
Aren't there some Orthodox Jews who believe it is not time for Jews to have Israel, who believe it's some kind of blasphemy according to the scriptures to take the land now? Can you explain their position please?
True, the Zioniara only bombed the British. Why MI6 was established.
Yes. Google Neturei Karta. Satmar.
Thank you. In this age, some Jews are the only ones making the claim that their faith entitles them to a piece of land. The US state department saw that as something to base an operation on, nothing more, nothing less.
Have you read the League of Nations decision of July 1922 made by 50+ countries, all not Jewish? "Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country; and
Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country;"
The League of Nations decision is in a very ironic way the victory of nazis, Jews are to be purged from other nations and put in one place where they don't bother no one. It's very racist and I'm sure something A. Hilfer would have approved.
Post a Comment