In 1947, the UN would be voting on a plan of partition to solve the 'problem' of the Palestine Mandate.
What did the CIA think?
Here:
It is apparent that the partition of Palestine into separate Arab and Jewish states (and an international zone), with economic union between the two states, as recommended by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on 29 November 1947, cannot be implemented. The Arab reaction to the recommendation has been violent, and the Arab refusal to cooperate in any way with the five-nation United Nations Commission will prevent the formation of an Arab state and the organization of economic union. The Arabs will use force to oppose the establishment of a Jewish state and to this end are training troops in Palestine and other Arab suites.
^
Posts
1 comment:
Haniyeh was a moderate Islamofascist because he only ordered others to die
The fear of a wider conflict seems to be only when Israel takes a defensive deterrent measure.
That's besides the point.
Worse is, the rebranding the dead butchers.
So some at MSM decided to attach the "moderate" label on the "diplomatic" leader of the regime' with its genocidal charter laced with antisemitic tropes weaved with Quranic text and whose vision is of an all out Islamic State with Israel gone.
You don't have to go very far but remember even only recent. Oct/7/23 - His praying, performing a 'prostration of Gratitude' to Allah while his regime led the 3,000 butchers/kidnappers and rapists under Allah Akbar cries. And his call on Arab Palestinians in the West Bank, Israeli Arabs, and the entire nation abroad to join.
His Oct/26/23 explanation: "we need the blood of women, children, and the elderly of Gaza," the old Palestinian death cult (since Arafat days) of 'dead baby strategy' to gather sympathy.
So, if Haniyeh wouldn't send others, but "volunteered" himself instead, is that when he will stop being an IslamoFascist "moderate"?
https://justsayingitoutloloud.blogspot.com/2024/07/haniyeh-was-moderate-islamofascist.html
Post a Comment