Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Are Arab Communities Illegal?

As per the BBC

Israel has decided to make legal under Israeli law three settlement outposts in the West Bank, the prime minister's office has said in a statement.  It said that a ministerial committee had decided to "formalise the status" of Bruchin and Rechelim, in the north, and Sansana, near Hebron in the south.

I wouldn't term those communities "outposts" and I think Rechalim was made legal; already years ago. And as for Rechalim, I was there at its founding about a month after the terror incident (from which my wife was saved, being in another bus) on the eve of the Madrid Conference at the end of October 1991 when our neighbor here at Shiloh was murdered, Rachela Druck.
In any case, we have a response:

The Palestinian Authority strongly condemned the decision. "Every single settlement built on Palestinian land is illegal", Chief Negotiator, Saeb Erekat, told the BBC..."I don't want to get into a discussion about what the Israelis use as an excuse for what is legal and what is not," says Mr Erekat, who handed the letter to the Israeli Prime Minister. "The Israeli government must choose between peace and settlements. It cannot have both."

I wonder, according to his thinking, is every single Arab community built in Israel...illegal?  Are they "settlements"?

Where's the logic, if not?

__________

UPDATE


Foreign Secretary condemns Israel’s legalisation of illegal outposts
24 April 2012

Foreign Secretary William Hague comments on the news that the Israeli government has legalised three outposts in the West Bank.

Foreign Secretary William Hague said:

“I strongly condemn the Israeli government’s decision yesterday to turn three illegal outposts in the West Bank into settlements. I urged the Israeli government in my statement on 5 April to remove - not legalise - outposts across the West Bank. I fully appreciate the difficult political discussion within Israel such action would require. However, the official sanction being given by Israel, designating outposts as settlements for the first time in over 20 years, sets a dangerous precedent for other outposts, which are illegal under both international and Israeli law.

“By seeking to entrench illegal settlements in the West Bank, as this decision does, the Israeli government risks sending the message that it is not serious about its stated commitment to the goal of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The United Kingdom, in common with all our European Union partners, urges the Israeli government to listen to Israel's international friends. The UK calls on the Israeli government to focus their efforts on a lasting resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict, to which this further shift in settlement policy presents one more obstacle. I call on the Israeli government to rescind this decision."


^

3 comments:

NormanF said...

Excellent point! Why should Arabs get an automatic entitlement to remain in pre-1967 Israel? Where is the logic that says Israel must remain 20% Arab while Palestine next door would be Judenrein?

What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander as well as when it comes to the alleged illegality of Jews living in Judea and Samaria, Arabs also have no right to live in the Jewish State.

There is no constitutional requirement Israel has to have an Arab minority at all. Anti-Jewish racism is accepted as normal in polite circles when uttered by Arabs like Erekat. That is both offensive and vile.

And it is never going to lead to peace.

Anonymous said...

Dear All

There are 150 UN Resolutions on Palestine.

One resolution pertaining to the Palestinian Territories is seen below.

God bless

Resolution 478 (1980) of 20 August 1980

The Security Council, recalling its resolution 476 (1980); reaffirming again that the acquisition of territory by force is inadmissible; deeply concerned over the enactment of a "basic law" in the Israeli Knesset proclaiming a change in the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, with its implications for peace and security; noting that Israel has not complied with resolution 476 (1980); reaffirming its determination to examine practical ways and means, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, to secure the full implementation of its resolution 476 (1980), in the event of non-compliance by Israel ; Censures in the strongest terms the enactment by Israel of the "basic law" on Jerusalem and the refusal to comply with relevant Security Council resolutions;

http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/DDE590C6FF232007852560DF0065FDDB

Marta Clavero said...

Honestly, I’m not that happy with this performance. I was tired from dancing in my cousin’s performance before this, and I didn’t have much time to rest. I don’t think I did justice to the choreography. I just thought I’d share since I got a lot of comments saying I should dance to Wedding Big Bang VN
big bangDress.

Tracklist for the mix I made with the choreography:
Kanye West – Power (remix) choreography by Keone Madrid
TaeYang – Wedding Dress choreography by Shaun Evaristo and Lyle Beniga
Usher – More choreography by Keone Madrid
Se7en – Digital Bounce choreography by Keone Madrid



On top of this, I danced to Jay Park – Abandoned with my little cousin. He was too shy to dance on his own so I offered to be in his performance with him.