Excerpts:-
The other day I played a leading role in a Michelle Malkin syndicated column about liberal media bias. Her complaint provides an interesting glimpse into the feverish workings of the paranoid mind of the far right.
...To cite a column I wrote as evidence of liberal media bias makes exactly as much sense as citing a Michelle Malkin column as evidence of conservative media bias. (More precisely, conservative deranged cheerleader-from-Hell bias.)
...If this were an article about Obama, Malkin would probably call the author "adoring." In her telling, though, the news account is an "anti-war screed," because, after reporting that Bush believes that fitness sharpens his thinking, it follows the "he said-she said" wire reporting practice and gives a one-sentence quote to nutty anti-war protestor Cindy Sheehan, who asserts that Bush should spend more time doing "the nation's work." I'm not sure how this wire story can be described as a "screed," let alone an anti-war screed...
4 comments:
So first Chait writes:
Her complaint provides an interesting glimpse into the feverish workings of the paranoid mind of the far right.
Then Chait writes:
To cite a column I wrote as evidence of liberal media bias makes exactly as much sense as citing a Michelle Malkin column as evidence of conservative media bias.
Didn't Chait just prove that Malkin was right?
I understand liberals?
He gets to call her a "conservative deranged cheerleader-from-Hell" in a column about how divinely unbiased he is?! Man, what a readership he must have.
Welcome to the New Republic, the magazine which was Mussolini's #1 American cheerleader.
Post a Comment