Sobell and Pollard, Can Someone Explain?

In a "Letter to the Editor" today, Morton Sobell clarifies aspects of his previous admission and states:-

As for me, I helped an ally (admittedly illegally) during World War II. I chose not to cooperate with the government in 1950. The issues are now with the historians. Morton Sobell, Bronx, Sept. 12, 2008

Sobell was arrested in August 1950 and in April 1951 was sentenced to 30 years imprisonment for the crime of spying for the Soviet Union, then an enemy of the United States, of conspiracy to commit wartime espionage, by handing over to his handlers sensitive military material. In 1969, Sobell is released from jail. He did not cooperate with the trial proceedings and never testified, either against or for the Rosenbergs or himself.

Total time behind bars: 19 years.

As regards the Rosenbergs, I found this:-

The Rosenbergs' death sentences were reported as the first under the Espionage Act of 1917, which imposes death as a maximum penalty for espionage in wartime. In peacetime the maximum penalty would be twenty years' imprisonment.

Now, consider this -

Jonathan Pollard was arrested in late 1985 and sentenced to life imprisonment in March 1987 for the crime, on behalf of an ally, of aiding Israel, not during wartime needless to note. He had entered into a plea agreement, cooperating fully with the prosecution yet his life sentence, with a recommendation that he never be paroled was in violation of the plea agreement he had reached with the government.

Jonathan Pollard was never indicted for harming the United States nor was he ever indicted for compromising codes, agents, or war plans or charged with treason in that he ever spied for an enemy state in time of war.

Jonathan Pollard was indicted on only one charge: one count of passing classified information to an ally, without intent to harm the United States.

Court of Appeals Judge Stephen Williams called the case "a fundamental miscarriage of justice" and wrote that he would have ordered that Pollard's sentence be vacated.

So, tell me, why is Jonathan Pollard still in jail 21 years

after being sentenced? What is the difference in the leniency

granted Sobell and the cruelty displayed to Pollard?

What am I missing here?

Ethel: She Loved Her Husband More Than Her Children

One of the most significant elements of the Rosenberg Affair has been the story of her two sons. They have kept alive the hope that somehow, their parents weren't spies. And if their father was, their mother wasn't.

Well, now we have heard from Martin Sobell. In this NYTimes article,

Morton Sobell was tried and convicted with Julius and Ethel Rosenberg on espionage charges...[and now] dramatically reversed himself, shedding new light on a case that still fans smoldering political passions. In an interview, he admitted for the first time that he had been a Soviet spy.

And he implicated his fellow defendant Julius Rosenberg, in a conspiracy that delivered to the Soviets classified military and industrial information and what the American government described as the secret to the atomic bomb...Was he, in fact, a spy? “Yeah, yeah, yeah, call it that,” he replied. “I never thought of it as that in those terms.”

...Most of the protagonists in the case, Mr. Sobell included, were committed Communists at the time they spied for the Soviets. “Now, I know it was an illusion,” Mr. Sobell said. “I was taken in.”

But what about Ethel?

“She knew what he was doing,” he said, “but what was she guilty of? Of being Julius’s wife.”

Julius's wife.

And the mother of her two sons? She was 34 and the mother of two young sons when she appeared before the grand jury and was arrested on the courthouse steps after her testimony. Being a mother doesn't count?

I guess not.

She went to the chair, knowing she could save herself but at the risk of condemning her husband. But her husband was already condemned.

Government prosecutors later acknowledged that they had hoped that a conviction and the possibility of a death sentence against Ethel Rosenberg would persuade her husband to confess and implicate others, including some agents known to investigators through secretly intercepted Soviet cables. That strategy failed, said William P. Rogers, who was the deputy attorney general at the time. “She called our bluff,” he said...

Why did the prosecutors go after her?

...the grand jury transcripts indicate that Mrs. Rosenberg was aware of the conspiracy. Spying was broached the first time by her husband in 1944 at the Rosenbergs’ Knickerbocker Village apartment in Lower Manhattan, Mrs. Greenglass testified. “I was horrified,” she said, but added that Mrs. Rosenberg “urged me to talk to David. She felt that even if I was against it, I should at least discuss it with him and hear what he had to say.”

Mrs. Greenglass, who died earlier this year, said her sister-in-law also was in the kitchen when Julius bisected the side of a Jell-O box that a courier would use as a signal to retrieve atomic secrets from David Greenglass.

However

...James Kilsheimer, the only surviving prosecutor of the Rosenberg-Sobell case, said on Thursday, “We always thought Sobell was guilty, and we knew that Julius was.” He said that the trial testimony about Ethel’s typing was not inconsistent with what Ruth Greenglass told the grand jury but was developed by him “during the pretrial process.”

And what do the sons say?

The Rosenbergs’ younger son, Robert Meeropol, described Mr. Sobell’s confession Thursday as “powerful,” but said he wanted to hear it firsthand. “I’ve always said that was a possibility,” Mr. Meeropol said, referring to the question of his father’s guilt. “This is certainly evidence that would corroborate that possibility as a reality.”

Robert Meeropol, the Rosenbergs’ son, said that even if he were to accept Mr. Sobell’s verdict, “It’s not the end of what happened to my mother and it’s not the end of understanding what happened to due process.”

Spy or not, was Ethel a good mother?

She had an option: to be a grieving widow/remarried icon or a martyr for Communism.

She made her choice.