...in his J Street address, [Beinart] also repeated his call for changing U.S. tax rules so that charitable contributions to West Bank settlements will not be deductible.That, I would suggest is an intolerable step to take. It reveals the evil that lurks in his heart. If his opposition to Jewish life in portions of the historical Jewish national home, as delineated by the League of Nations, a territorial area that was betrayed by the British Mandatory regime, is rational-based, there would be room for debate and discussion although, as I and others have written, his arguments and thinking are ridiculous and his facts are, well, not facts. But in making an appeal to involve outsiders, he is taking the controversy into uncharted waters, for who knows what will develop. Has the recent Supreme Court decision on Jerusalem bothered him? To what other issues will his animosity take his attention and activity? What will he next consider undemocratic in his illiberalism? Beinart must be informed and persuaded that he has chosen a wrong path. And let me add this interpretation of his that highlights his problem: “What really struck me when I read [Netanyahu's] writings and that of his father Benzion, and then about the Revisionist tradition, is this belief that the world is a very nasty place, and the Jews are in danger because they don’t recognize its nastiness. Because they’ve gotten this crazy idea that they’re supposed to be better than everybody else. And that this is deep in our history, it’s something that has emerged over hundreds and hundreds of years in the Diaspora − and we’ve got to get rid of it. We’ve got to become like everybody else.” As we know, especially after Touluse, yes, the world is a nasty place. And, yes, the Jews are in danger. We do not have this idea of being better. He has it for otherwise, he wouldn't be berating Israel to be better. And we surely do not need to get rid of the feeling and as for being like evertone else, well, it's an either/or situation, Peter. Either we are, for example, like the Arabs or like the United States, who act much worse than Israel on the battlefield, in the diplomatic world, etc. or we are like - khow we are and deal with it. Many have criticized him. There need be more. ^
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
The Evil That Lurks in Beinart
Peter Beinart, as we all know, want American Jews to boycott Jews and their industries and businesses if they live and work in Judea and Samaria, across the "Green Line".
But he has more expansive desires.
He wants American Jews to do more and involve others outside the "Tribe".
As reported,
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
In Beinart's op-ed he wrote:
Having made that rhetorical distinction, American Jews should seek every opportunity to reinforce it. We should lobby to exclude settler-produced goods from America’s free-trade deal with Israel. We should push to end Internal Revenue Service policies that allow Americans to make tax-deductible gifts to settler charities.
Peter Beinart wants sanctions only against the Jews.
What about sanctions against Arabs who promote incitement, anti-Semitism and hatred of Israel and who refuse to make peace? I haven't heard him bring up Arab extremism and decades of hostility to Israel's existence at all.
Beinart is assigning guilt to the least responsible party and he has already for forgotten there are two sides to the conflict.
Then his own position does not accord with any liberal values; its illiberal. Jews should be doing everything they can to strengthen the only free, liberal and humane country in the Middle East.
Why won't Beinart? That's a very good question, indeed.
Post a Comment