Showing posts with label Satmar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Satmar. Show all posts

Sunday, April 05, 2026

Introducing Miriam Engel (whoever "she" is)

"Miriam Engel" is to be found at Instagram.

Whoever she really is I do not know but "she" is an AI creation but with a twist.

The creator obviously is from within the Satmar (or closely related) court of Hassidim, uses largely Yiddish and deals with very Haredi/Jewish subjects and themes.

And does so in sometimes an outrageous but good-hearted and humorous manner.


"She" stretches limits but
within limits.

Here is one of here more 'shocking' series, with her on a motorcycle and the results of the wind:







^

Sunday, May 03, 2020

De Blasio’s Tweet: Anti-Semitic? A Misspeak? Or What? (UPDATED Oct. 21/22)

UPDATED to include DeBlasio's statement Oct. 21.
See below.

On April 29, probably after being alerted by this tweet, and after shutting down a Satmar yeshiva a week earlier and a report that mikvaot will still operating despite a closure order on April 7, and a report on March 31 that some Jewish NYC funeral homes were overstacked with bodies, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio tweeted:

@NYCMayor
Something absolutely unacceptable happened in Williamsburg tonite: a large funeral gathering in the middle of this pandemic. When I heard, I went there myself to ensure the crowd was dispersed. And what I saw WILL NOT be tolerated so long as we are fighting the Coronavirus

Jewish funerals with hundreds and even thousands of Haredi particpants not practicing social-distancing or mask-wearing were all over the news (like that on April 2 of the Skulener Rebbe which also led to police being injured -







and another funeral
here; and here; on April 5; and April 1; and one which led to contretemps and shouting at cops and an arrest). Not to mention this wedding or this one. 

In other words, these infractions of a dangerous nature (and defined as pikuach nefesh and those who practice such can be termed a rodef) were multiple, repeated, highlighted in the media including the Haredi press and web sites but with little, it would appear, or better, not enough, adequate enforcement either by the city institutions or by Jewish community leadership. In practice, the Aharon Teitelbaum Satmar Hassidic court on March 18 became strict 



but not, it would seem, in practice. They form the backdrop to what happened next.

A short while later, he tweeted out this

My message to the Jewish community, and all communities, is this simple: the time for warnings has passed. I have instructed the NYPD to proceed immediately to summons or even arrest those who gather in large groups. This is about stopping this disease and saving lives. Period.

While the first was liked some 6,600 times, the second, which explictly mentioned Jews, received some 34,100 likes (as of May 3).

His third tweet on the matter, again, that same day, after the uproar, was


We have lost so many these last two months + I understand the instinct to gather to mourn. But large gatherings will only lead to more deaths + more families in mourning. We will not allow this. I have instructed the NYPD to have one standard for this whole city: zero tolerance.

Did de Blasio purposefully employ Jewish community? Did he think there are several Jewish communities and the one closest to him, politically and financially, that is, the Hassidic/Haredi community, was the one that counts? Did he practice a double standard? Or what?

Was it an example of this perspective?


Select instances of noncompliance in Haredi communities, while certainly real, are given outsized attention in news media and internet discourse, creating a sensationalist public discourse that falsely suggests that Haredim, as a homogenous bloc, refuse to practice social distancing. The scapegoating of Haredim is increasing

For sure, there is some proof of anti-Jewish remarks stemming from that funeral. For example, Peter Bradley wrote:

If you watch the video, you will see a person barking orders. He is concerned that the people in the street aren’t wearing masks. In all likelihood, his concern is probably more based on the continuing negative publicity that this Hasidic funeral will generate from the media!

(I commented that that was: is a big guess, an assumption based on ??? Bias?)

This April 15 video was posted zeroing in on Williamsburg and Boro Park and it included a warning to stay at home and not attend synagogue services. On April 7 Naftuli Moser published his op-ed on Hassidic/Haredi behavior at weddings and funerals and linking that to connections with the political establishment, including the Satmar Rebbe`s March 16 prounouncement (with its problematic content):





 and after three Haredim were attacked as mosrim (here in another instance)




and an April 6 report on police crackdowns. Two days after the major Williamsburg incident, another crowd gathered for another funeral, this time in Boro Park.

Satmar came out and backed the Mayor:


We strongly denounce the vicious attacks against the Mayor, particularly those accusing him of anti-Semitism. The close relationship between Mr. De Blasio and our community go back close to two decades, during which time we have come to know, respect and appreciate his understanding and sensitivity to the unique needs of our community. We consider him a dear friend and pray for his success.




although that was attacked, some claiming it a reflection of Galut mentality. The clear message of the Novominsker Rebbe in early March, who later died of the disease, was ignored, even though there were community voices that decried the violations of the Corvid19 rules. As did a Rebbe.

One result, perhaps, is the appointment of a Frum Captain to serve as NYPD Jewish Community Liaison and another was the letter of Ted Cruz in which the Texas Senator wrote


it is especially dangerous to single out the Jewish community in a city that is experiencing a substantial rise in violent anti-Semitism.The Department of Justice should not hesitate to closely monitor New York City to ensure that the mayor’s rhetoric does not translate into constitutional violations

So, was De Blasio being anti-Semitic? With blood on his hands?





Or was this a one-off anti-Semitic incident? Can he really afford to be anti-Semitic? Did he scapegoat the Jews (even though he tweeted “My message to the Jewish community, and all communities”)? Is the city’s past pitiful response to anti-Semitic violence indicative of an anti-Semitic City Hall? Was he displaying underintelligence? Was he insensitive to the special circumstances that had developed in the situation of high-profile Jews perceived as purposefully and negligently flouting restrictions that could possibly affect other Jews and non-Jews and that his words would encourage anti-Semitism? When he tweeted the “Jewish community”, was he blind to the Jewish community at large or other Jewish communities or did he think, as perhaps Satmar assisted him to so think, that they are the real Jews and he just followed through?

One aspect stemming from the Satmar letters is one faces a tough choice: if you believe Satmar, no anti-Semitism by de Blasio. If you do not believe them, are you perhaps anti-Semitic?

According to Jacob Kornbluh, de Blasio is claiming to have spoke unintentionally, that he:
reached out to a number of Jewish community leaders in the last few days to clarify his tweet. He added: “I regret that I used words in the wrong way — in terms of giving the wrong impression, but I don’t regret sounding the alarm.”
Was the attack on de Blasio an attempt to cover for what has been described as a gross failure of leadership by Jews from all types of communities?

We may never know.

I would suggest that rules and regulations be followed if only to follow the instruction in the Ethics of the Fathers 3:2:


"Pray for the welfare of the government, for without the fear of it, man would swallow his fellow alive." 

Or was his outburst a cover-up for his incompetence?

P.S.

Here is a new summary article.

There is this feeling I have seen:
De Blasio repeatedly failed to act on a surge of antisemitic attacks in NYC, and sought to dismiss them as the work of the right and the fault of Donald J. Trump.De Blasio announced he had mixed feelings about the Trump Executive Order on campus antisemitism, because protecting Jews from campus antisemitism allegedly infringes on free speech rights.De Blasio’s own subordinates attacked De Blasio’s repeated attempts to whitewash African American antisemitism on the grounds that ALL antisemitism is right-wing.

And a Christian pro-Israel spokesperson Laurie Cardoza-Moore of PJTN wrote to her followers that:

Threatening to arrest “the Jewish community” for violation of social distancing by a minority faction, cast a further shadow that validated Jew-hatred and a backlash of antisemitic violence and response in America’s largest city. This is unacceptable and the Mayor needs to step down from his office as he is “unfit to serve” as the leader of a city that is home to the one million-plus Jewish community he was set in place to serve. “Rounding up” the Jewish community for arrest in the public forum speaks of a time we must never allow to re-emerge.

And now I see this:

Rabbi Gershon Edelstein, one of the heads of the Ponovezh yeshiva in Bnei Brak, gave a Torah class in which he explained why he believes most of those infected with coronavirus in Israel were from the haredi community.
"We need to understand something - in Israel and around the world, there are haredim who died of this plague more than anyone else," Kikar Hashabbat quoted Rabbi Edelstein as saying. "The Chazon Ish (Rabbi Avraham Yeshaya Karelitz - ed.) said that when people sin, it's by accident. A haredi who sins is doing it on purpose. Judgement is harsher for haredim."
_____________________

UPDATE  May 11, 2020

In a letter to Makor Rishon, Shmuel Pappenheim, himself who was sick with Corona, indicates that major sections of the Haredi community do have ideological problems with authority, and view governmental instructions with disdain:




UPDATE

Kahal Tolaas Yaakov threatened with closure for ongoing violations.

Previously violent couple use the Mayor’s  words to justify their anti-Semitic hate attack on May 11.

---------------------------

“I look back now and understand there was just more dialogue that was needed,” de Blasio said during a press conference Tuesday. “I certainly got very frustrated at times when I saw large groups of people still out without masks but I think more dialogue would have been better so I certainly want to express my regret that I didn’t figure out how to do that better.”

“That one night in Williamsburg I let my frustration and concern get away with me and I should have been more careful in my language and I’ve expressed my apology for that before,” de Blasio said Tuesday. He added, “The No. 1 takeaway from the meeting is more dialogue. More communication is the way forward.”

Next day's Andrew Cuomo:

“No,” Cuomo simply said during an Albany press briefing when asked by a Post reporter whether he believes an apology is owed.

“I am sorry that they feel the disruption, I am sorry that they are disrupted, their religious ceremonies are disrupted, how many people they can have in a synagogue is disrupted, how many people they can have at a wedding is disrupted, the operation of their schools is disrupted. I am sorry for that,” said Cuomo.

The governor continued, “In the same way I’m sorry to the Catholic community and Muslim community and to all New Yorkers. I’m sorry that we are going through this. I’m sorry that people are dying. I’m sorry the state has to impose disruptions on your life. I’m sorry that we had to close your businesses which may mean you lose your business.”



^

Wednesday, June 02, 2010

Overkill

No, not the flotilla.

The respect afforded certain Rabbis:-

The mass protest was called for by Rabbi Aaron Teitelbaum, the Grand Rabbi Of the Satmar Chasidim, who took part in the demonstration, and by other Rabbinic Rabbis.


Rabbinic Rabbis?

Are there non-rabbinic Rabbis?

Is a Rabbi's wife not only a Rebbitzen but a non-Rabbinic Rabbi since they usually assist their husband's in areas of family purity?

P.S. Nice to see the Stars & Stripes there.



At least the Satmar identify with some form of secular nationalism if not Zionism.


- - -

Friday, July 10, 2009

The Satmar Anti-Zionists or, Jews Against Judaism

Abraham Wieder is the mayor of the Satmar Kiryas Joel in New York.

With nothing else on his municpal table, he sent off a letter to President Barack Obama bashing Israel. Sources say that the letter was written in reaction to the anti-Obama rhetoric of some religious pro-settler organizations, which have become increasingly vocal in recent weeks as the Obama administration continues to push the Israeli government to curb settlement growth in the West Bank as a prerequisite for a peace settlement.

Wieder’s letter reads in part (the full text is up at Jews Against Zionism):

“Life is Judaism’s most precious commodity; its preservation and the prevention of bloodshed are its more central tenet. When life is in jeopardy all commandments that guide Jewish life must be set aside in order to preserve human life. My heart therefore aches over the endless loss of innocent life just to hold on to lands inhabited by one’s enemies. I therefore deeply respect and support you and pray that divine providence guides your every move.

“Some Israeli politicians resist relinquishing any part of the holy land claiming religious prohibitions. This is wholly fallacious! In fact, after the destruction of Israel in 69 CE, Jews were commanded to await divine redemption and prohibited from conquering the land. To this day Jews yearn and pray for the divinely inspired return to Jerusalem… The modern State of Israel stands in contravention of the Almighty’s prohibition. Its effort to cloak itself in religion as a means of continuing the contravention of the Almighty is laughable if it weren’t so sad.”


Just one comment.

This assertion - "Jews were commanded to await divine redemption and prohibited from conquering the land" - the central tenet of Reb Yoelish, saved from being burnt alivve by a Zionist but let's not get personal - is hogwash. I have dealt previously with the issue of the Three Oaths but there is no 'command' character to this Midrash. It is but an outlook element, hashkafa, and the amount and quality of Rabbios opposed to such an interpretation basically classify Satmar and its Neturei Karta spin-off and Jews Against Judaism.

(Kippah tip: Failed Messiah)

Monday, June 22, 2009

Satmar's Glanz Goofs; Headlines the NYTimes

This is an interesting story:-

...Rabbi Glanz, who resigned last week as a part-time city chaplain after it was revealed he had arranged a lavish six-hour bar mitzvah party in a New York City jail for the son of a prisoner.

To the uninitiated, Rabbi Glanz’s ability to pull off such an outlandish event may seem wondrous. Certainly, concern over how the celebration came to be authorized, as it was by top Correction Department officials, has resulted in multiple investigations.

But interviews and city records show that Rabbi Glanz has a long history of access and influence, of seeking favors and performing them, and of acting as a liaison between the insular world of the Satmars and elected officials.

For two decades, he has been something of a Satmar master of ceremonies, arranging official tours of the community, based in Williamsburg, translating Yiddish for political leaders, charming mayors and their aides with gifts, then soliciting money and support for his sect’s priorities.

A rumpled 51-year-old who often juggles cellphones and has favored a sport utility vehicle equipped with lights and sirens...


And even Yeshiva World News gets mentioned:

...allied with a less powerful Satmar faction, but one that retains power.

That power was evident in the spring of 2008 at the meeting with the new state police superintendent, recorded by the Yeshiva World News Web site, when Senator Adams asked the Satmar to back Governor Paterson.


Read it all.

Monday, December 01, 2008

He Doesn't Represent Israel?

As reported

The family of Aryeh Leibish Teitelboim, one of six people killed when the Chabad House in Mumbai was attacked by Islamist militants last week, has rejected Israel's offer to hold an official memorial ceremony for him along with the other Jewish and Israeli fatalities.


That's their right.

Of course, since he was an American citizen, if America had wished to place an American flag on his coffin, I doubt that there would be a protest. They family would wait until an appropriate moment and remove the flag. They would make a 'tzimis' (a fuss, in Yiddish) about it.

And the reason?

"The murder victim was educated in the ways of Satmar, which opposes the State of Israel," one of Teitelboim's relatives told Haaretz. "How can he turn into a symbol of the State of Israel? The family is very concerned about what will happen here at the ceremony. They are angry about the whole matter, it is a very sensitive issue."


Very simple. He was killed because his killers saw him as a Jew, as a representative of Israel. They can't comprehend the difference the Satmar wish to delineate in their theologic ideology.

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

A Satmar Hasid Makes News, Very Bad News

This is about one person and unproven and so, it should not reflect on the community. But I will admit it couldn't have happened to a 'better' group of Chassidim.

Upstate New York Rabbi held on molest charges

An upstate rabbi barricaded himself inside his home early yesterday after FBI agents came to arrest him for allegedly sexually abusing his daughter. The feds had to break down two doors to collar Israel Weingarten, 58, who was hiding in his bedroom, a prosecutor said in Brooklyn Federal Court.

Weingarten is charged with sexually abusing the victim starting in 1990 when she was 9 years old, and the molestation continued until she was 18.

...Weingarten [is] living...in the Satmar community of Kiryas Joel in Monroe, Orange County. The prosecutor said the kids have been "brainwashed" to believe what he wants them to believe about the abuse of their sister.

Defense attorney Kenneth Gribtez said the allegations are "stale," dating back 11 years, and stem from a bitter divorce between Weingarten and his wife...


and this

The prosecution's court papers accused Weingarten of trying to kidnap the victim in England and assaulting a rabbi and his wife, who were protecting her.

Gribetz asked the judge to free Weingarten without bail or on a personal security bond, arguing his client "had no reason to flee."

Azrack said she was disturbed not only by the nature of the allegations but by Weingarten's behavior when the FBI came to his home. She said she believed he may be a danger to his own relatives.

"I'm not inclined to release him under any circumstances," the judge said. "I question how rational he is and whether he is willing to obey orders of the court."


and this

His daughter began attending a school in Manchester England in 1996 with the help of some community members, which gave her some protection from her father.

However, during the summer of 1997 Weingarten brought his daughter alone to New York for a few weeks and then to Belgium for a month, without any other family members present.

“The abuse the victim suffered while alone with her father in Belgium was the worst she endured,” state court documents...

...In 1999 the daughter refused to leave England to return home during the holidays, and Weingarten attempted to kidnap her from a family which was trying to protect her. During the attempted kidnapping Weingarten forced his way into the home of the head rabbi of the school and assaulted the rabbi and his wife.

Afterwards the daughter fully broke from her family and from the Sat Mar community. She reported her father’s abuse to the FBI in 2003.


Does anyone, regarding the "leaving aspect" only, know what has happened with Gitty?

P.S. Let's even this out a bit. Here.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

New Study Guide for the Satmar "VaYoel Moshe"

The book "VaYoel Moshe" ויואל משה is the ideological tract of the Satmar Hassidim. It originally appeared in 1959 but an expanded edition, to include an analysis the the Three Oaths, was published in 1961. The author was the Satmar Admor, Yoel Teitelbaum.

I discovered today that just recently (the haskamot are from the month of Iyar, two months ago) the Stamar's published what I call a study guide to the book, משנתו של רבינו (Our Rabbi's Teaching), one which presents summaries and divides the book into learnable sections within a time framework.

Here is the frontispiece:



And here is a page to illustrate the technique of the explanation concept:-



Antizionism is alive and kicking in Williamsburg and Kiryas Joel, even if Gitty left town.

Friday, July 18, 2008

Gitty Has Friends

Have you read about Gitty Grunwald, mother a chozeret b'tshuvah, Chabad father, Satmar husband (now divorced) and currently wild and on the other side?

In New York Magazine?



If you want to help her, go here.

P.S.

Seems the story of leaving and having a child left behind has another angle, Baila Glauber,



here.

==========================

UPDATE

Response from a Hareidi source.

Sunday, December 16, 2007

What Will Jewess Blog's RHF Comment?

On this story:-

A Display of Disapproval That Turned Menacing


...this was Orange County, and the victims — a husband and wife who are members of the Hasidic sect known as Satmars — said they were being harassed by those in their own insular world here.

The woman, Toby Greenberg, told the police that the root of the harassment was her decision to deviate slightly from the culture of modesty that defines and reinforces this Orthodox Jewish enclave of bewigged women in long-sleeved shirts and ankle-length skirts and bearded men in black hats and long black coats.

According to the police, Mrs. Greenberg said she was singled out because she chose to wear denim skirts, long, natural-looking wigs made of human hair, and stockings without a visible seam — traditionally worn because they show that women’s legs are not bare.

The incidents offered a rare glimpse into the strict social dynamics that govern life in this village of 20,000 people, an hour from Manhattan and not far from West Point. It is a place where television and the Internet are forbidden and women do not drive, restrictions intended to provide a haven from the temptations of the outside world.

...“If we find they have a TV or a married woman won’t wear a wig, we will invite them to speak with us and try to convince them it’s unacceptable, or next year we will not accept their children into the school system,” said David Ekstein, the vice president of the village’s leading congregation, Yetev Lev, and one of eight men who make up the committee, hand-picked by Rabbi Aaron Teitelbaum, the town’s spiritual leader.

...the New York State Police started to investigate the case of Mrs. Greenberg, the 25-year-old mother of a young daughter, and her husband, Yoel, who accused the vaad hatznius of orchestrating the harassment. According to the police, leaflets calling the couple immoral and threatening them with expulsion were scattered in the streets and delivered to their home.

In September, the tires of their Chevrolet Impala were slashed and the warning “Get out, defiled person” was slathered in Yiddish in white paint on a window of their Mazda CX-7. That was when Mrs. Greenberg approached the authorities — a rare move in a community that is loath to attract attention from secular law enforcement.

...“People are hot-blooded. They see her on the street and have asked her nicely to stop wearing tight-fitted clothing, but she wouldn’t listen,” said a woman working at Kiryas Joel Shoes, who identified herself only as Sarah. “If she had behaved as she does inside the four walls of her house, it would have been fine, but on the street is different. She turned it into a dirty public thing.”

And although Sarah, a mother of 11 children, did not condone any efforts to drive the Greenbergs from the community, she said: “They’re not after you if you go off a little bit. You really have to do something to bring shame.”

After two months of fruitless inquiries, the police closed the investigation last month. “Pick any ethnic group and people are suspicious at times,” said Sgt. Warner Hein of the State Police. “They don’t want to be seen as cooperating, even at the expense of tragedies in their own community.”


As it is said:

Qui cum canibus concumbunt, cum pulicibus surgent.

Of course, in Yiddish, it sounds much better:-

אז מע לייגט זיך מיט א הונט, שטייט מען אויף מיט פליי