One Mary Crabapple, born Jennifer Caban in New York City to a Puerto Rican father and a Jewish mother, who was the daughter of a Belarusian immigrant, has published a book on the Bund, It has been criticized as just another anti-Zionist tract using the anti-Zionist Bund as a vehicle.
One review is here by Allan Arkush. As it mentions Jabotinsky and almost Betar (see below), I thought I would add some context and even corrections.
In the first section:
While condemning the Zionists in general for exploiting the Palestinians’ labor, Crabapple criticizes the Labor Zionists in particular for locking them “out of the Zionist economy in the same way Polish labor policy locked Jews out of jobs in Warsaw.” Even worse, she writes, was the “fascist” Vladimir Jabotinsky, who allegedly wrote in his famous essay “The Iron Wall” (1923) that “Israel could only be built by subjugating the native people.”
This is all false or—what is worse in popular history—mendaciously half true. The Zionists did not aim to “supplant” the Arab population of Palestine, though most of them did hope to eventually outnumber them through peaceful immigration. They usually promised, and they usually intended, however, to treat them decently if that goal were to be reached. This is true even of Jabotinsky. In the very essay that Crabapple describes as shattering “the genteel doublespeak of the Zionist Congress,” he looks forward to a time when one could discuss with a moderate Arab leadership “honestly practical questions, such as a guarantee against Arab displacement, or equal rights for Arab citizens, or Arab national integrity.” In his later writings, he defended even more emphatically the entitlement of Palestinian Arabs to equal and even national rights in a Jewish state.
As for Jabotinsky and the national rights of Arabs in the Jewish state:
Jabotinsky denied the Arabs' national claim.
and this section:
Much as she enjoys besmirching the reputation of socialist Zionists, Crabapple doesn’t neglect to berate Jabotinsky and the Revisionists (whose minority status within Zionism she never bothers to indicate). With some justification, she places blame on them for the agitation that led to Arab riots in Palestine in 1929, but astonishingly (or not) she makes no mention of Haj Amin el Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem, who by all accounts played a key role in fanning the flames.
“During the same years that the Polish government demanded the expulsion of three million Jewish citizens,” Crabapple tells us, “Jabotinsky toured the country calling for their ‘evacuation,’ a fine distinction that the Bund didn’t appreciate.” What the Bund did understand was how this illustrated that “Zionists were ideological twins of the same people trying to force Jews out of Europe”—as if the implacable victimizer and the aspiring rescuer were morally indistinguishable. In this context, Crabapple mentions a memoir that she ran across at YIVO of a teenage girl who had belonged to a Revisionist youth group in the 1930s. Quickly disenchanted both by its hostility toward Arabs and its plan to “kick Jews out from every country” but Palestine, she joined the Bundist Tsukunft (Future). One cannot help but wonder what good that did her in the immediately ensuing years.
Only when she describes the last-ditch joint resistance of Jewish youth of diverse political stripes in the Warsaw Ghetto does Crabapple grant that any Zionist ever behaved honorably, though even here she gets in a dig. The Zionist-organized Jewish Combat Organization, she relates, “elected a tough, grandiose boy named Mordechai Anielewicz, a member of the left-wing Zionist youth movement Hashomer Hatzair” to play “the mostly ceremonial role of commander in chief.” Why? “They picked him because he wanted it so much.” That, at any rate, is what Crabapple gleaned from a sympathetic biography of the Bundist Marek Edelman. You’ll find an utterly different account of Anielewicz’s selection in the authoritative account of Warsaw Jewry during the war by another survivor of the fighting in the ghetto, the Israeli historian Israel Gutman.
Anielewicz was in Betar until his middle teens and he later bemoaned that while in the Marxist HaShomer HaTzair, he neglected his earlier military training in favor of cultural activities/ The Bund, of course, sabotaged any cooperation with Betra and the Revisionists in the Warsaw Ghetto uprising.
^
.png)





No comments:
Post a Comment