^
Roger Cohen declares Iran's Ahmadinejad "odious but I don’t think he’s dangerous" but asserts that Israeli and U.S. alarmism is "a dangerous pattern" ("Iran, the Paper Tiger", Oct. 12). Are these two instances of danger value-equal? Iran might have a nuclear weapon of mass destruction and is actively engaged in achieving that goal. Iran is in an aggressive mode, the U.S. and Israel are in a defensive one. Yet Cohen assumes the role of a leveller for Ahmadimejad. Perhaps Cohen is the danger?
- -
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
1 comment:
In more normal times (?), the Roger Cohens of this world would be locked up in Bedlam to scream their insane rants to the rest of the inmates: Ahmadinejad, Abbas, the Cleggeron and Osama/obama.
Or sent to the Tower of London. They would either be beheaded or hung, drawn and quartered.
Post a Comment