The second is an attack on Rabbi Michael (Mordechai Dov) Shudrich who organizes trips to the graves of tzaddikim in Poland who is thought not to be adequatley sensitive and caring for the special kosher diet needs of those travelling of Poland's LOT airlines. He is a guarantor of the kashrut of the food but they claim he has less than adeequate (for them) credentials.
Posts
4 comments:
I note that you seem to be derisive of the Aida Chareidis Rabbis and their views. They are merely advising those who follow their teaching and halachic decisions to be careful of things that they deem below halachic standards. To speak derisively and scoffingly of the Raabbis is a severe violation of Jewish Law (e.g., see Chofetz Chaim on the subject). Sorry to see you in this position. larafka18
a) you're right
b) you're wrong
c) there is a difference between Hashkafa and Halacha and since I don't wear a sthreimel, there are bound to be differences.
Sorry YMedad, Halacha and Hashkafa are not the issues that I raised. Of course there are differences and good that there are, so long as they don't violate the Torah. I was talking about scoffing those with whom you disagree. That is the Halachic violation and it is compounded when they are Rabbis. That was my point. Not to defend, although I may agree with them, but to point out my disappointment that I perceived. BTW, I don't wear a shtreimel either but spend a lot of time in Mea Shearim and am treated only with respect, despite my American-style dress. Lafarka18
You seem to have missed my point. If a Rav promotes his own Hashkafa, i.e., dancing classes for women are a no-no, which is totally unsupportable in Halacha, then I am not scoffing him (which I didn't even if it was Halacha). Did I write anything bad, demeaning, saying a Rav was a nut case? Maybe you have a problem knowing that that poster was an example of extremism for its own sake and nothing Halachic about it?
Post a Comment