Showing posts with label settler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label settler. Show all posts

Friday, January 25, 2019

Yes, Re-Settlement is a Term

Between February 13-15 this year, this Conference will take place:



It will be held at the Center for Advanced Studies, LMU Munich, Seestraße 13, Munich, Germany.

I note the explanation:


Human settlements are changeable and are being changed. The processes that come into play here are manifold: abandonment, interruption, relocation, shrinking, growth, change of status, re-naming and re-settlement

I guess I am also a resettler.


Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Why The Term "Settling" Is Unsettling

Consider this story:

Extremist German preacher allowed to settle in BritainDecember 17 2018, 

An extremist preacher from Germany accused of leading a group responsible for radicalising scores of jihadists was allowed to settle in the UK.  Brahim Belkaid, 41, was given leave to remain and has been living in Leicester for the past five years after returning to Europe from Syria... He posted an image of bullets and a sword’s blade reading “Jihad: the only solution” to his Facebook page. Posts to the same Facebook profile also appeared to promote Anwar al-Awlaki, the American Islamist who planned several deadly attacks as a leading member of al-Qaeda.

^

Thursday, June 28, 2018

Revenants and Ghosts and Me

Remember my revenant post of 14 years ago (already?)?

It's core essence:

...why I think the word "revenant" should be used instead of "settler". 
a revenant is one who returns after a lengthy absence. A revenant can be any person who shows up after a long absence such as those who come back to their ancestral home after years of political exile. This is the classic definition although Sir Walter Scott used it in his novel the Fair Maid, to denote a ghost. It stems from the French "revenir," which means simply "to return". 

That 'ghost' connection disturbed some and others took advantage of it as if it made my term irrelevant.

Of course, that was before the Oscar Awards and Leo DiCaprio's performance.

But there actually is a 'ghost' in classic Zionist thinking.

Take this into consideration, from Leo Pinsker's Auto-Emancipation:

With the loss of their fatherland, the Jewish people lost their independence, and fell into a decay which is not compatible with existence as a whole vital organism. The state, was crushed before the eyes of the nations. But after the Jewish people had yielded up their existence as an actual state, as a political entity, they could nevertheless not submit to total destruction — they did not cease to exist spiritually as a nation. The world saw in this people the uncanny form of one of the dead walking among the living. 

The ghostlike apparition of a people without unity or organization, without land or other bond of union, no longer alive, and yet moving about among the living, — this eerie form scarcely paralleled in history, unlike anything that preceded or followed it, could not fail to make a strange, peculiar impression upon the imagination of the nations. And if the fear of ghosts is something inborn, and has a certain justification in the psychic life of humanity, what wonder that it asserted itself powerfully at the sight of this dead and yet living-nation ?

Fear of the Jewish ghost has been handed down and strengthened for generations and centuries. It led to a prejudice which, in its turn, in connection with other forces to be discussed later, paved the way for Judeophobia.

...Judeophobia is a form of demonopathy, with the distinction that the Jewish ghost has become known to the whole race of mankind not merely to certain races, and that it is not disembodied, like other ghosts, but is a being of flesh and blood, and suffers the most excruciating pain from the wounds inflicted upon it by the fearful mob who imagine it threatens them.

Judeophobia is a psychic aberration. As a psychic aberration it is hereditary, and as a disease transmitted for two thousand years it is incurable. It is the fear of ghosts; which, as the mother of Judeophobia, has evoked that abstract, I might say Platonic hatred, thanks to which the whole Jewish nation is wont to be held responsible for the real or supposed misdeeds of its individual members, and to be libelled in so many ways, to be buffeted about so disgracefully.

So, I'm still using the term revenant.

You?

P.S.

'Settlements' are communities.

'Settling' is actually resettling.

^

Sunday, September 24, 2017

Moshe Shertok, "Settler"

Moshe Shertok, Israel's first Foreign Minister and second Prime Minister, was the son of Yaakov Shertok (or, Tzertok).

Yaakov arrived in Eretz-Yisrael in July 1882 and when the first group of Biluim arrived a short time later, he joined them and they lived in a commune in Jaffa's orchards.


In 1906, he rented a house





 in Ein-Sinya, north of Rammalah, 




owned by Ismail Al-Husseini, uncle of Amin, later to become the Mufti.


He found it via an ad:




The house included a flour mill, oil press and fruit orchard. Yaakov, his brother Ze'ev and their sister, Gutteh Katinsky rented it together, intending eventually to buy it.  They brought their extensive library of books as well as the family piano, carried all the way from Jaffa on the back of a camel.  Moshe and his brother Yehudah went to school in nearby Bir Zeit.


And they marketed their produce of kosher for Passover olive oil:





They were, in today's semantics, "settlers".

However, they suffered financial losses and their Arab hired labor constantly stole their harvest, their livestock (they had a sheep herd) and their foodstuffs they purchased in Jerusalem.  There was no doctor and the school, while preparing Moshe to be an Arab language scholar, was empty of Jewish content.  They left and in 1908 were back in Jaffa, in the Amzalag House in Neveh Tzedek.


Thanks to David Assaf.

^

Monday, January 18, 2016

Another Reason I Don't Like The Term "Settlers"

There's a TV ad with the line:

We’re settlers son, we settle for things,” 

That is spoken by a father explaining to his son who asks why they can’t have DirecTV like their modern neighbors. 

As criticized

The campaign plays on the word, presenting a frontier-era family in a suburban neighborhood who stick to antiquated ways such as a horse-and-buggy and, oh yeah, cable.

Another opinion:

The ad is funny...But the real emotion of this spot goes much deeper than cheap laughs. The real emotion here is assumptive embarrassment, a weapon DirecTV has been using for years. This particular ad suggests that anyone using cable is that Dad on a tractor in his front yard, a settler.  Of course the creative idea is way over the top, but that makes the point sticky and tougher to take as a cable patron. And I’d wager some pretty hefty percentage of the cable viewers paused for a second and wondered, “Am I settling with cable?”

I am not embarrassed to reside in my ancestral patrimony, my historic homeland.  And if a certain term contributes to that perspective, then I'll be a resident, a revenant.

^

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Why I Don't Like To Use "Settler"

This is why, a story from South Africa:-

Landslide endangers settler home

A HUGE landslide on the N2 near Grahamstown is threatening to topple a historic settler homestead that has stood for 170 years.



Remember, the term is revenant or resident.