If the gov't authorizes a new location with the same amount of land and housing units in an area that was up until now off-limits to Jewish settlement, I would accept the agreement. ( I should point out I totally oppose an evacuation of Talia Sasson's supposedly 'illegal' outposts and passive resistance is justified in opposing it). Compromises worked out in the past have benefitted the YESHA project, so I would not automatically reject this offer until we see concretely what the gov't is offering.
I think I would also. Since the buildings are mostly temporary and they are moving not too far away and considering the ramifications of a pro-settlement gov't decision and if they move only after new buildings are in place, that would be a great benefit to the entire settlement enterprise.
If the gov't authorizes a new location with the same amount of land and housing units in an area that was up until now off-limits to Jewish settlement, I would accept the agreement. ( I should point out I totally oppose an evacuation of Talia Sasson's supposedly 'illegal' outposts and passive resistance is justified in opposing it). Compromises worked out in the past have benefitted the YESHA project, so I would not automatically reject this offer until we see concretely what the gov't is offering.
ReplyDeleteI think I would also. Since the buildings are mostly temporary and they are moving not too far away and considering the ramifications of a pro-settlement gov't decision and if they move only after new buildings are in place, that would be a great benefit to the entire settlement enterprise.
ReplyDelete