Tuesday, April 05, 2011

Does America Rule Over Jerusalem?

Here's Jill Biden, wife of US Vice President Joe Biden, in the Old City of Jerusalem last March.

That reminds me of a Herlian pose.

This one:


Anyway, it was used to illustrate a story about an:

...Israeli Peace Initiative [that] calls for the establishment of a Palestinian state on most of the West Bank and Gaza with East Jerusalem as its capital [and] The plan states that Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem would go to Israel and Arab ones to Palestine. The Temple Mount would be under no national sovereignty but the Western Wall and Jewish Quarter in the Old City would be under Israeli rule...

So, is that picture a subliminal hint that America rules in Jerusalem?

But let's not forget the Israeli initiative that tries to suck up to the Americans:

Yaakov Perry the former head of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) said he sent a copy of the two page document to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu who promised to read it. "We are isolated internationally and seen to be against peace," Perry told the Times in a telephone interview. "I hope this will make a small contribution to pushing our prime minister forward. It is about time that Israel initiates something on peace," he said.

and from here:-

Amnon Lipkin-Shahak, a former military chief of staff, said he and the other signatories felt the Israeli government needed to be prodded into action. "We felt we have to wake everyone up. Time is passing, and it's not working in our favour," he said.

Subservients, I would say.


^

1 comment:

ziontruth said...

"We are isolated internationally"

So HaShem said we would be, always. Resisting it is no good, it only makes this worse. Instead, try making lemonade out of the lemon.

"and seen to be against peace"

No--"seen to be against the Marxist/Islamist agenda" would be correct. An agenda that all the righteous of the world, Jews and non-Jews alike, must fight, for it is their freedom that is on the line.

"It is about time that Israel initiates something on peace"

We have little of ourselves, and certainly we do not have spare land to give away. Let the Arabs pursue a peace initiative, in which they will give us land (they have it aplenty), and in exchange, we will give them peace. That is just and viable and fitting for a change.