tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7014209.post6681487422014615973..comments2024-03-28T14:55:27.949+02:00Comments on My Right Word: Did You Know I Spoke German?YMedadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14333122797414935958noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7014209.post-83638479486620462192007-06-15T21:38:00.000+03:002007-06-15T21:38:00.000+03:00They're fighting over the money. The Int'l/Region...They're fighting over the money. The Int'l/Regional funding. Same as Y'sser. They're not fighting for beliefs or political prestige.<BR/><BR/>There are reports of H'mas control and then talk of Int'l Trps in G'za. These things further establish G'za as part of another state. Another military state (in the present).<BR/> <BR/>The moderate faction [sic] is staged as the loser. The highly publicized "restricted/sanctioned" Int'l funding/arms; now controlled/confiscated by a "terrorist faction." There are no factions and certainly no moderates. This is a representation of continuum. Continuum of a plan (global).<BR/><BR/>The rock attacks (queued by lack of travel restrictions), and the constant announcement of "groups of terrorists" arrested, are signs imo. Continuum; stages of a plan. Even if they aren't such, specifically, one is still aproximating reality through the fog of the popular debate. An escalation of attacks in the East is implied. Grains of sand leading to Ar'b control of J/S. The plan leads to J/S, N'gv and G'za as an Ar'b state. <BR/><BR/>Time frame? The media releases keep hinting at a couple of years. This is ployed as the political ambition/legacy of some people in "foreign" office now. Officials are transitory, they don't make legacies or policy; globalists/industrialists write the story and own the paradigm. To promote a time frame and a fictional political reason is to imply intent. They hint at less than two years (by late 2008).<BR/><BR/>But it could be five years, a decade or more. "The physical reality should reveal the actual time frame." <BR/><BR/>That physical reality includes G'za (as it is now), the rockets from G'za, the Leb' War, the W'll, the rock attacks and these constant announcements of "groups" arrested in J/S. Officialdom of every loyalty are pointing to J/S. <BR/><BR/>"Groups of terrorists" would be militaryunits. The constant announcement of arrests could be a precursor to a military attack on a civilian target. Why does officialdom/media keep announcing that "groups are present" by announcing the arrests? <BR/><BR/>A brutal attack (hotel, school, hospital?) would be followed by a military response. Meanwhile more control will be ceded to Ar'bs, inch by inch. The Int'l Community will debate/discuss crisis, factions, foreign aid and Int'l troops. Sound familiar? A routine. The debate/discussions implies control for the world audience. This subdues people worldwide, it negates the killing/destruction and allows continuum. <BR/><BR/>These military attacks on civilian targets has happened in the past. periodic. A clear pattern representing planning and organization. We should note that nothing was said about warcrimes during or after the Leb' War though there was a month of civilian targetting rocket warfare "broadcast worldwide!" The announcement of arrests are saying that there's a presence of armed, trained units. There has to be a reason for this.<BR/><BR/>The stage is set for so-called factional fighting in R'mallah and the Eastern part of the State; this headlined in media now. All of this leads to more disenfranchisement in J/S (East of the W'll). It leads to more attacks too imo. <BR/><BR/>It's a course, a plan, a century plan of globalists. It's passed on, inherited. It began after worldwarone.<BR/><BR/>Why tell you what you may already know? Only because people are better off without false hope and diversionary debate. Those things dull the senses and set people up to be real victims.<BR/><BR/>The plan supports commerce and threat. Control mechanisms in a stratified hierarchical system. The plan divides the State; it "does not" destroy it. The reality inbetween is what we're concerned with. The map has been published for decades; it shows the State divided. It takes alot of force/power to publish that map worldwide over decades.<BR/><BR/>We have to watch the obvious (physical reality). Take things out of context. In the abstract, on the subconcious level, this is a hedge. When we deconstruct facades we have a sense of things unspoken. This changes our state of mind and our decisions (therefore it alters reality).<BR/><BR/>Take things out of context to see the physical reality. And I mean take "everything" out of context. i.e./ it's not a faction, it's a military unit. it's not a peace plan, it's something else.. <BR/><BR/>The mainstream debate is a control mechanism which subdues. Globalists are always removed from the sphere. Officials are actors/spokespersons and it is pointless to target them as individuals; it's actually part of the psychology and control (a diversion). With the mainstream debate we're really talking to ourselves. That does not change the course of long term international plans of elites. We have to keep "the debate" in check (in perspective.)<BR/><BR/>We have to watch the obvious; the physical reality.<BR/><BR/>Shabbat Shalom, Shavua TovAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com