tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7014209.post4355471456361674517..comments2024-03-28T14:55:27.949+02:00Comments on My Right Word: NYTimes Glosses Over Real Meaning of InterfaithYMedadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14333122797414935958noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7014209.post-10587642267762592652011-09-22T13:11:50.674+03:002011-09-22T13:11:50.674+03:00Thanks for input. Then that the participnats did ...Thanks for input. Then that the participnats did not see fit to invite a Jewish woman to participate shows their failing. But the reporter still should have written perhaps "it was too bad a Jewish female was not participating as modesty and fashion are quite intrinsic to traditional Jewish life.YMedadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14333122797414935958noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7014209.post-22451022856335547502011-09-22T12:16:42.169+03:002011-09-22T12:16:42.169+03:00Huh?
There were Jewish youth at this conference. ...Huh?<br /><br />There were Jewish youth at this conference. This reporter simply mentions an interesting exchange between Muslims and Hindus that took place after an official section ended. The fact that a Jewish perspective happened not to be mentioned--because no Jewish kids happened to be taking part in that small discussion-- means that the NYTimes glossed over something? There are lot's of things wrong with the times reporting but your knee-jerk taking offense is ridiculous.MJnoreply@blogger.com