tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7014209.post112548255392469314..comments2024-03-28T14:55:27.949+02:00Comments on My Right Word: And That's Another ReasonYMedadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14333122797414935958noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7014209.post-1125665918533775072005-09-02T15:58:00.000+03:002005-09-02T15:58:00.000+03:00Well, technically, it started as a result of anoth...Well, technically, it started as a result of another dalliance with Paula Jones but according to this site http://www.eagleton.rutgers.edu/e-gov/e-politicalarchive-Clintonimpeach.htm<BR/>Lewisnky very quickly came into the picture.YMedadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14333122797414935958noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7014209.post-1125540924847851532005-09-01T05:15:00.000+03:002005-09-01T05:15:00.000+03:00Not to detract from your point, which is 100% vali...Not to detract from your point, which is 100% valid, but I can't let this go by without protest: President Clinton was <I>not</I> impeached for his sexual misconduct. That was not one of the four counts against him, nor did it play any part whatsoever in the campaign against him. I don't recall any Republican even mentioning it as a reason to impeach him; the only public figures I recall denouncing him for it were Democrats, who vigorously denounced his behaviour but opposed his impeachment. I believe this was a deliberate strategy on their part, to make the issue Lewinsky instead of perjury and obstruction of justice.<BR/><BR/>The simple fact is that Clinton was impeached, and should have been convicted, because he was guilty of crimes which would have landed him in jail had he not been politically connected. Not because he was fooling around with a consenting adult who was not his wife.Milhousehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14350874508580081286noreply@blogger.com